It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anishnaabe
reply to post by ANNED
Yes, a truck stop would be my first option XD, and then the container idea, that would really throw them off course lol.
And yeah me to, i wouldve kept it a secret, that way they dont know, that you know that there watching you all the time.edit on 22-2-2012 by Anishnaabe because: (no reason given)
Actually, I've heard it's not uncommon for some finance companies to require GPS tracking in the cars that they own (that you're paying them for the privilege of driving).
Originally posted by Wertdagf
Yeah this automatically means its the alphabet agencys.
Originally posted by Anishnaabe
reply to post by ANNED
Yes, a truck stop would be my first option XD, and then the container idea, that would really throw them off course lol.
And yeah me to, i wouldve kept it a secret, that way they dont know, that you know that there watching you all the time.edit on 22-2-2012 by Anishnaabe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Goldcurrent
This guy has an ongoing issue with his former employer. He was reportedly on Workers Compensation for a few years.
This enabled him 90% pay with all of his benefits. When he returned he was on light duty which basically means he didn't have to do any hard work. His former employer (FORD, I believe) fired him for something trivial because he was basically useless. He then proceeded with legal action.
This GPS was OBVIOUSLY planted by his former employer to use against him. Many companies hire Private Eyes to spy on Workers Compensation claimants because of fraud. Lots of guys will claim injury with nearly full pay and end up working other jobs (under the table) or be seen mowing thier lawns etc.
This sort of stuff is very common.
Originally posted by I.C. Weiner
reply to post by Anishnaabe
I am an IT guy, and you are correct on both points. It would be possible to find the frequency that it is transmitting on, intercept packets, then be able to tell where the packets are being sent. Or plug in the card and get the info from there.
Text
reply to post by Anishnaabe
Originally posted by I.C. Weiner
reply to post by Anishnaabe
I am an IT guy, and you are correct on both points. It would be possible to find the frequency that it is transmitting on, intercept packets, then be able to tell where the packets are being sent. Or plug in the card and get the info from there.