World Wide Seismic Event...

Hi all back from a long hiatus. This thread certainly has grown and gotten more interesting I must say. I read the other day about that 4.4 near Yellowstone, that sounds pretty scary. I was doing some reading about how yellowstone is a super volcano and I discussed it with a friend. He called me an "alarmist" and say I believe a lot of bull I read over the internet. He said Mt. Rainer (sorry spelling) is more of a threat, but yet it sleeps and I should stop being paranoid. Also the weather has been very weird here in South Texas. Periods of intense heat, then fall like weather some days. The other day we had a thunderstorm virtually come out of no where and it even shocked the local weatherman.

P.S. Dragonrider, I thought you left? You sure came back fast dude..lol

A magnitude 6.0 earthquake IN GUATEMALA has occurred at:
14.07N 91.05W Depth 117km Mon Aug 25 06:28:37 2003 UTC

Here is a pretty big one.

== PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE REPORT ==
Alaska Earthquake Information Center
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Version #6: This report supersedes any earlier reports of this event.
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.


A moderate earthquake occurred at 23:31:54 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time on Thursday, August 21, 2003. The magnitude 5.4 event occurred 109 km (68 miles) W of Arctic Village, AK. The hypocentral depth was 10 km ( 6 miles).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Magnitude 5.4
Time Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 23:31:54 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 8:31:54 PM (ADT) - Atlantic
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 7:31:54 PM (EDT) - Eastern
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 6:31:54 PM (CDT) - Central
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 5:31:54 PM (MDT) - Mountain
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 4:31:54 PM (PDT) - Pacific
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 3:31:54 PM (AKDT) - Alaska
Thursday, August 21, 2003 at 1:31:54 PM (HST) - Hawaii
Distance from Arctic Village, AK - 109 km (68 miles) W (281 degrees)
Wiseman, AK - 125 km (78 miles) NE (40 degrees)
Coldfoot, AK - 143 km (89 miles) NE (36 degrees)
Venetie, AK - 154 km (96 miles) NNW (333 degrees)
Fairbanks, AK - 383 km (238 miles) N (358 degrees)

Coordinates 68 deg. 16.9 min. N (68.282N)
148 deg. 7.7 min. W (148.129W)
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles)
Location Uncertainty Error estimate not available
Parameters Nst=044, Nph=044, Dmin=0 km, Rmss=0 sec, Gp=0,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=6
Event ID# ak00029515

The only event of any magnitude so far globally is a 4.9 in the Philippine Islands, but we have also had another 4+ in California:

Hmmmm,

You know what, I think this thread is long enough as it is. It's basically a black holes in which pointless posts with long lists of insignificant earthquakes are listed lately. Just browse through the last couple of pages and draw your own conclusion, if this is what is meant by quality, the standards must have been lowered lately.

I would also like to turn your attention to a thread I created on the magnetometer often cited here as a HAARP indicator. The HAARP-earthquake connection which is often implied here definitely deserves more scrutiny then it has now. However, I want to raise the issue as well of the HAARP-magnetometer connection which I higly doubt as you can read in the thread linked below.

Link

Well this is what EMSC is currently showing

2003/08/26 11:09:53.2 45.9N 2.8E 10 Ml2.3 A LDG FRANCE
2003/08/26 10:38:33.4 45.2N 0.3W 10 Ml2.7 A LDG FRANCE
2003/08/26 08:58:05.3 46.5N 10.1E 2 Ml3.1 A LDG NORTHERN ITALY
2003/08/26 08:58:04.4 46.5N 9.9E 10 Ml2.8 A SED SWITZERLAND
2003/08/26 08:58:04.3 46.5N 10.0E 10 Ml2.7 A SED NORTHERN ITALY
2003/08/26 08:58:03.0 46.4N 10.0E 7 Ml2.8 M SED NORTHERN ITALY

Nothing 'ground-breaking' there
A quiet day compared to others that we've had.

The Palmer station is only showing slight activity at 7:10, yet it hasn't been updated since 21:00 yesturday which is strange

By the way, Devils Advocate this thread hasn't been primarily been about explaining links between HAARP and Seismic Activity. If you read the first post and most others this thread has been about Current Seismic Activity. FULL STOP. The HAARP theory was a theory to explain the days with high quake count, a theory. But it was proven that the HAARP trace is being manipulated so now it is no longer completely reliable, and could be used to throw anyone off-track.

[Edited on 26-8-2003 by MrEisenhower]

I am a new member here, but have been watching this site for over 2 years, just never joined yet. In reply to dragonrider, although I agree that no, mars probably is not having this affect on us, although it is closer than it has been in over 60,000 years and it is kinda strange how all of a sudden the Sh!ts hitting the fan, there are a couple things wrong with your post. Mars is not thousands of times farther away, it is actually only a 147 times as far away as our moon. and it is not really anywhere near in size to our moon... it is 3 times the size of it. And well see Mars is not only a few hundred miles closer... it is 2 times as close as it was 2 months ago. So while yes I agree it is most likely not having that affect on us, it is a lot closer and bigger than you made it sound. Now if you take the moon and mars, and put them in the same allignment with earth, both of their gravitational pulls together could possibly be enough to alter conditions on earth. There has been a change in the Magnetic pull of earth here recently which would also suggest that something is causing that pull to alter. No pun intended to you Dragonrider, you are one of the smartest on here, just wanted to revamp on some of your comments

Originally posted by MrEisenhower
By the way, Devils Advocate this thread hasn't been primarily been about explaining links between HAARP and Seismic Activity. If you read the first post and most others this thread has been about Current Seismic Activity. FULL STOP.

Read carefully please, I was not saying that this thread about the connection between HAARP and Earthquakes, I was merely saying that there's a lot of posts in that direction...

The HAARP theory was a theory to explain the days with high quake count, a theory. But it was proven that the HAARP trace is being manipulated so now it is no longer completely reliable, and could be used to throw anyone off-track.

Sure, a theory, which I think will not hold, and am trying to disprove on the basis of inadequate information to draw conclusions from.
And which HAARP trace??? If you clicked that link that I provided, you might even question whether a magnetometer could even pick up transmissions from HAARP, and thus can be dubbed "HAARP-trace". And if it is unreliable then why is everyone still using it??
I think you conspiracy guys should be more careful with your sources.

[Edited on 26-8-2003 by Devils Advocate]

Ooooppps... Couple mistakes in my post. Mars is only 2 times the size of the moon. And It is 6 times as close now as it was 6 months ago.. Don't want to post any false info....

~~UPDaTE~~ EMSC is now showing some larger quakes in the Kermadec Islands of mag 5

2003/08/26 19:40:13.0 46.9N 13.8E Ml2.2 A GFZ AUSTRIA
2003/08/26 19:40:12.1 46.9N 13.6E 1 MD2.8 A OGS AUSTRIA
2003/08/26 19:40:11.2 46.9N 13.6E 10G A MIX AUSTRIA
2003/08/26 18:00:10.3 51.9N 3.7E 10 Ml3.0 A LDG THE NETHERLANDS
2003/08/26 17:34:57.6 33.3S 179.2E 33 Ms5.0 M GSRC SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS
2003/08/26 17:34:55.5 33.1S 177.6W 33 mb5.2 A NOR SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS
2003/08/26 17:34:55.5 33.1S 177.6W 33 mb5.2 A NOR SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS

Nothing too major today.

A magnitude 5.6 earthquake NEAR THE COAST OF PERU has occurred at:
17.07S 70.54W Depth 31km Tue Aug 26 21:11:35 2003 UTC

2003/08/26 18:24:16 NEW JERSEY 40.56N 75.10W 5km deep 3.8 Mag
2003/08/26 02:26:56 W KENTUCKY 37.08N 88.74W 5km deep 3.1 Mag

NJ/PA?
That's unusual.
pennlive.com.../base/news-6/1061950140304641.xml

And more activity in the NMSZ.
folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu...

-B.

2003/08/27 06:43:30.0 38.5N 7.3W Ml2.1 M IMP PORTUGAL
2003/08/27 06:24:39.9 19.6N 155.2W 160 mb4.8 M GSRC HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
2003/08/27 01:44:49.9 22.2N 94.3E 25 mb4.4 A NEWS MYANMAR
2003/08/27 00:50:55.0 5.3S 86.0E mb5.3 A GFZ SOUTH INDIAN OCEAN
2003/08/27 00:03:29.0 12.1S 104.3E mb6.0 A GFZ SOUTH INDIAN OCEAN
2003/08/27 00:01:53.6 25.1S 122.9E 10 mb5.9 A SED WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Mag 6 in the indian ocean with a mag 5.9 in Western Australia, bit of movementt this morning.

I had a dream about an earthquake in california the other night.... hopefully I am wrong.

OK this is my first time viewing this thread and I dont really feel like reading 45 pages.....My question: What do you guys think this is? I read a few pages and some believe HAARP is a possible explanation. Anything else? My suggestion is: I saw on discovery that every Billion years or so Northpole and Southpole switch their magnetic fields....
Regards
SP

No your right.

There will be one, but not at the moment.

Originally posted by TheyWatchYouToo
I had a dream about an earthquake in california the other night.... hopefully I am wrong.

you were right

news.com.au...

Earthquake shakes New Jersey, LA
From correspondents in Milford, New Jersey
August 27, 2003

MINOR earthquakes shook a rural area in west-central New Jersey in the eastern United States and Los Angeles County in the west. No injuries or serious damage were reported.


-------------------------
LA is in california isnt it.

excuse my bad geography if it isnt.

Originally posted by Banshee
2003/08/26 18:24:16 NEW JERSEY 40.56N 75.10W 5km deep 3.8 Mag
2003/08/26 02:26:56 W KENTUCKY 37.08N 88.74W 5km deep 3.1 Mag

NJ/PA?
That's unusual.
pennlive.com.../base/news-6/1061950140304641.xml

And more activity in the NMSZ.
folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu...

-B.

Last night my cat was wild as he-ll. Normally he goes to sleep but around 11:00pm he was going nuts clawing at the sliding glass door to get out. My wife couldn't believe his actions. He did this for over 1/2 hour. I told her that maybe he was acting strange because of impending seismic activity or Mars. Very strange indeed.

A magnitude 5.0 earthquake IN HAWAII has occurred at:
19.33N 155.21W Depth 10km Wed Aug 27 06:24:22 2003 UTC

2003/08/27 14:41:07.0 44.1N 26.1W mb5.0 A RNS NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 14:40:55.5 44.4N 27.8W 33 mb5.0 A LDG NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 14:40:45.5 43.8N 28.8W 33 Ms4.7 M GSRC NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 14:40:45.0 43.7N 28.7W Ml5.8 M. PDA NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 14:40:41.0 43.6N 28.9W 10G mb5.1 A MIX NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 14:40:31.0 43.1N 31.0W mb5.3 A GFZ NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 14:40:07.8 43.7N 35.3W M 5.1 A INGV NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN
2003/08/27 13:15:33.5 45.5N 26.4E 199 MD4.3 A BUC ROMANIA
2003/08/27 12:40:29.8 11.4N 19.7W 33G A MIX NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN
2003/08/27 12:38:54.6 5.0N 33.0W 10 mb5.3 A SED CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003/08/27 12:38:17.0 4.1N 41.5W mb5.5 A GFZ NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN
2003/08/27 12:31:56.0 59.9N 84.8E Ml3.8 A NNC SOUTHWESTERN SIBERIA, RUSSIA
2003/08/27 09:54:38.9 45.4N 27.0E 33 MD2.2 A BUC ROMANIA
2003/08/27 09:54:37.8 45.5N 26.9E 16 MD2.4 M BUC ROMANIA
2003/08/27 09:34:14.0 43.2N 0.3W 10 Ml3.2 A LDG PYRENEES
2003/08/27 09:34:12.4 43.1N 0.4W 10 Ml3.1 A LDG PYRENEES
2003/08/27 06:43:30.0 38.5N 7.3W Ml2.1 M IMP PORTUGAL
2003/08/27 06:24:39.9 19.6N 155.2W 160 mb4.8 M GSRC HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
2003/08/27 01:44:49.9 22.2N 94.3E 25 mb4.4 A NEWS MYANMAR
2003/08/27 00:50:55.0 5.3S 86.0E mb5.3 A GFZ SOUTH INDIAN OCEAN
2003/08/27 00:03:29.0 12.1S 104.3E mb6.0 A GFZ SOUTH INDIAN OCEAN
2003/08/27 00:01:53.6 25.1S 122.9E 10 mb5.9 A SED WESTERN AUSTRALIA
2003/08/26 23:57:30.3 39.8S 149.6E 33G A MIX SOUTHEAST OF AUSTRALIA
2003/08/26 23:56:28.0 45.1S 173.1E 30 mb6.3 A ODC OFF E.CST OF S.IS. NEW ZEALAND
2003/08/26 23:56:26.0 45.8S 168.3E 33 Ms4.8 M GSRC SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND
2003/08/26 23:56:23.0 46.3S 172.9E A GFZ OFF E.CST OF S.IS. NEW ZEALAND

Some more seismic activity today. It's generally those that are Mag 5 and below. But theres a Mag 6 in New Zealand! I wonder if it was felt on the East Coast of the South Island in Christchurch.

I believe that Valhall hasn't been around recently. ?