It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Government Insider Says Bush Authorized 911 Attacks

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2004 @ 03:01 PM
link   
vey long article (transcript of actual interview)

www.rense.com...

A MUST READ !!!

Government Insider Says Bush Authorized 911 Attacks



posted on Sep, 17 2004 @ 05:28 PM
link   
There are many out there that will say because the source is Rense it is Bull. I offer this two year old article that shows Rense to be more mainstream than most believe. Facts have been there for some time, just ignored or labeled, conspiracy wackos, or left wing nuts.
The fact is we have right wing nuts in control who will do anything to accomplish the dream of American dominance world wide. And not necessarily by Americans merely staged from our land with our tax dollars and blood.
When you realize the truth it will be too late.

TUT





All Along the Watchtower
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Opinion

Thursday, 20 June, 2002




The warnings from all those foreign intelligence services, after all, are quite real. Egypt, Germany, Russia and the Israelis were vociferous in their concerns. The German intelligence service BND told US and Israeli intelligence that Middle East terrorists were "planning to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and Israeli culture." The BND's information came through Echelon, the American-controlled network of 120 satellites that monitors all worldwide electronic communications.

Egypt voiced similar warnings that same month regarding aircraft attacks. Delivered just before the G-8 summit in Genoa, Egypt's alert carried such weight that anti-aircraft batteries were placed around Columbus Airport in Italy. The Russians warned the US that same summer of 25 pilots who had been trained for suicide missions, and Putin himself delivered the warning "in the strongest possible terms" to the US government. The Israeli intelligence service Mossad delivered a warning to both the FBI and the CIA detailing "a major assault on the United States" against "a large-scale target" that was "very vulnerable
etc.......

LIHOP Theory, however, is not so easily dismissed. Two French intelligence analysts, Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, have published an extensively-researched book entitled "Osama bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth." In it, they allege that the Bush administration put energy policy before national security concerns. According to Brisard and Dasquie, a foundering pipeline project aimed at exploiting natural gas reserves along the Caspian Sea in Turkmenistan was revived by the Bush administration when it arrived in Washington in January of 2001.

The pipeline project, which sought to bring oil and natural gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to a warm water port, had been the brainchild of American petroleum giant Unocal for much of the 1990s. After the destruction of two American embassies in Africa in 1998 by Osama bin Laden, the Clinton administration forbade any American companies from doing business with the Taliban, which had been sheltering bin Laden in Afghanistan. Unocal's pipeline project was frozen.

www.truthout.com...



posted on Sep, 17 2004 @ 06:00 PM
link   
I don't buy any of this for one second. If it's true that he has documentation of Bush signing orders for 9/11 to occur he would have made millions of copies of those and distributed them to every news agency out there. You don't keep information like this a secret and if your life is being threatened it's all the more reason to be as much in the spotlight as possible! I also don't like the fact that he does not mention names. He has no paperwork to back him up and he will not say who has threatened him.
I think he's pulling things out of the air but a very basic point that he raised made me question his thinking process. Saying that Bush looked 'nonchalant' when his Aide told him of the second plane hitting the tower, IMHO is not accurate. Bush did NOT look non chalant. He looked very concerned and it appeared as if it was difficult for him to remain seated there. He looked exceedingly uncomfortable and you could tell that he wanted to get out of there fast. Most of us were shocked and stunned when we heard the news of 9/11. Heck, even Kerry said that he was frozen for nearly 40 minutes after hearing the news. But Bush was visibly shaken NOT non chalant as this man perceived it.
Guess what it all boils down to is perception and if Hilton thinks Bush was nonchalant (the definition of which is having an air of unconcern or indifference) I think his perception of other things might be a bit exaggerated as well.

Jemison



posted on Sep, 20 2004 @ 10:30 PM
link   
[edit on 22-9-2004 by ancientsailor]



posted on Sep, 20 2004 @ 11:20 PM
link   
This guy needs to put up or shut up. If he has no documentiation or proof of any kind then how can anyone believe him. I can't stand Bush but not even I can believe something like this without proof.



posted on Sep, 21 2004 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Weller
This guy needs to put up or shut up. If he has no documentiation or proof of any kind then how can anyone believe him. I can't stand Bush but not even I can believe something like this without proof.



Agreed.
This has been covered before.



posted on Sep, 21 2004 @ 10:57 PM
link   
IF any of this is true, (and I agree, put up or shut up), who ordered the first bombing of the WTC?

But, I believe that our President's are following a pre-set agenda. It's just not as upsetting when the Dems do it.

Are those boots I hear outside?

The Spider



posted on Sep, 21 2004 @ 11:02 PM
link   
Alex Jones has no proof that the goverment was behind 911. He is just parinoid. And yes did the govermemnt order the first WTC bombing. Everyone forgets about that one now.



posted on Sep, 21 2004 @ 11:10 PM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thread closed.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join