It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by s12345
How much responsibility should Hollywood hold for creating false impressions? As Hollywood films, have became a source of truth for some do they have a responsibility for truth: representing history and real life things truthfully?
Originally posted by s12345
How much responsibility should Hollywood hold for creating false impressions? As Hollywood films, have became a source of truth for some do they have a responsibility for truth: representing history and real life things truthfully?
Originally posted by s12345
How about historical events: when they are made into films as they aren't fictional events they change what people think happened. Surely if something factual is covered there is a responsibility. How about the film A beautiful mind, in real life the mathematician wasn't ill until after he wrote the paper(long after) obtained all his degrees before getting ill. How about coverage of ww2: America joined Britain into the war.
Originally posted by s12345
How much responsibility should Hollywood hold for creating false impressions? As Hollywood films, have became a source of truth for some do they have a responsibility for truth: representing history and real life things truthfully?
Originally posted by s12345
History should not be misrepresented as it has been many times by Hollywood: do not rewrite history in your favour, show it as it was, not as you want it to be.
Originally posted by s12345
It is based up on the available data. Saying America led ww2 or took apart in things it did not is not correct as proven by the facts. It is a misrepresentation and something that is supposed to be of a historical event should be covered a certain way: correctly: Hollywood lies so that America looks better than it actually is.