Shake down on Milosevic Case and History

we all know what is the triger for USA to attack someone
for example president of USA put his signature for atack on Serbia only when get nasty, becouse his afere with Monika Levinski was 1 cnn news and he wanted to change that
but ...

All US actions should be revised by a specially formed commitee which will then decide whether they were legal, which they weren't. Lookfor example at the Iraq invasion, the situation in there is much worse now than it was before... The same with Afganistan, and why??? Because of US and their allies' involvment. Bombing Yugoslavia? Well because Yugoslav president SLobodan Milosevic, was brave enough to say no to Americans. He should be tried for the thngs he did to his own people, and should be tried in Serbia and Montenegro.

Originally posted by khruschev

[Anyway how can the US judge what is right and what is not, who is a terrorist and who is not, when the American continent was only discovered in late 15th century, when the country was habitated by the hindus, and later on they were practically exterminated by the ones who nowdays call themselves the "true Americans"????

Just exactly when was America inhabited by HINDUS? We must have done a hell of a job wiping them out because the ONLY ones I have ever met own a Gas station/Motel/ Burger joint

Ok, you can call them native americans. What happened to most of them? I can't say there are a lot of them today... Especially not a lot of those who are actually living at close standards to those of white people in America. Yes, I am saying white because the black Americans are also rejected by American society along with other races...

Originally posted by khruschev
Ok, you can call them native americans. What happened to most of them?

Native Americans and hindus are two totally different people.

There are more Hindus living here now than there were BEFORE 1492

Before you start slinging mud you should at LEAST know what you are talking about

[edit on 17-10-2004 by Amuk]

Originally posted by Amuk

Originally posted by khruschev
Ok, you can call them native americans. What happened to most of them?

Native Americans and hindus are two totally different people.

There are more Hindus living here now than there were BEFORE 1492

Ok than what people were the native Americans? You still don't answer to my question, what happened to most of them?

Originally posted by khruschev

Ok than what people were the native Americans? You still don't answer to my question, what happened to most of them?

They werent HINDUS Hindus are in Asia not America.

And yes they got a raw deal but are getting us back with cheap smokes and Casinos

And just what does this have to do with the topic?

If you want to talk about the early American HINDUS you need to start another thread and lets keep on topic on this one

[edit on 17-10-2004 by Amuk]

Originally posted by Amuk

And just what does this have to do with the topic?

If you want to talk about the early American HINDUS you need to start another thread and lets keep on topic on this one

[edit on 17-10-2004 by Amuk]

Ok, I understood they weren't hinndus, you don't need to repeat it 5 times. I didn't start the argument over Hindus, you did. You could have just corrected me instead of making fun of it... Anyway the point of my post wasn't whether native americans were Hindus or not, but whether USA has the right to decide who is going to do what or not...

Sorry

Some times I get a little carried away. It just seems like every other post no matter WHAT its about goes stright to what evil people Americans are. You are posted as Russian does the Name Stalin ring a bell? One of the biggest Mass Murderers in history, How about Mao, another one, Hitler, the slaughter of the Chinese by the Japanese, the list goes on and on and these were a lot later in history than the 1500s. Was what we done right? NO. But history is full of such stuff we did not invent it.

America is not the root of all evil


Now back to the topic at hand