It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by nyk537
I did ask a question in my posting, as well, I asked if it was your child who had days or weeks to live, are you really going to spend that time running a capaign to get elected....????!!??
Most people woudn't be in a position to choose, they would have to work to pay the medical bills.
I would like to think that most people, if they had the money for the bills, wouldn't choose to spend the little time that their child would be on this earth, running a capaign to get themselves elected.
If it was me, and my child was sick like that, and I had the money to pay the bills, I would spend every second I had with her.
To answer your question, no it is not a bad thing that he is taking time off to be with her, it is a bad thing that he is not taking more time off.
He puts mor importance on becoming the republican nominee, than the little time he has with his child, that he will NEVER get back.
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by nyk537
Yes I do not understand how a person could put a political campaign above being with their child, when they have the resources too.
You avoid my question again, thats fine, I just don't get it.
I just don't get that a Political Career would be more important than your sick child.
I just don't get that a christian would not put family above career.
I just don't get why you would put your sick child in front of cameras.
I just don't get how fighting for the republican nomination is making the world better for his child.
I just don't get how you could spend so much money on a campaign, when those resources could have been put towards a foundation to further R&D into the helping other with the same illness.
I just don't get it, you are right.