It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Those reporters are wrong, as always.
Ron Paul doesn't want to cut 2/3 of the military. He wants to bring the troops home to defend America.
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Those reporters are wrong, as always.
Ron Paul doesn't want to cut 2/3 of the military. He wants to bring the troops home to defend America.
When the wheels of the war machine are slowed down it will mean less wars on the horizon and the war industry and everything around it will adjust to it and shrink.It is a natural consequence.How much it will depends on a lot of things of course.Most american soldiers might back Ron paul but the weapon industries and such will not for this very reason i imagine.
Originally posted by N3v3rmor3
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Those reporters are wrong, as always.
Ron Paul doesn't want to cut 2/3 of the military. He wants to bring the troops home to defend America.
When the wheels of the war machine are slowed down it will mean less wars on the horizon and the war industry and everything around it will adjust to it and shrink.It is a natural consequence.How much it will depends on a lot of things of course.Most american soldiers might back Ron paul but the weapon industries and such will not for this very reason i imagine.
after the great depression and everyone was jobless, did they not make changes to become industrialized? and did the industrialization of america not create jobs for america? people working for the weapons industries can go fix the fracking or make wind generators. who cares about the weapons we only need what is necessary to defend ourselves. which after this presidency might be a hell of a lot anyways
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by N3v3rmor3
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Those reporters are wrong, as always.
Ron Paul doesn't want to cut 2/3 of the military. He wants to bring the troops home to defend America.
When the wheels of the war machine are slowed down it will mean less wars on the horizon and the war industry and everything around it will adjust to it and shrink.It is a natural consequence.How much it will depends on a lot of things of course.Most american soldiers might back Ron paul but the weapon industries and such will not for this very reason i imagine.
after the great depression and everyone was jobless, did they not make changes to become industrialized? and did the industrialization of america not create jobs for america? people working for the weapons industries can go fix the fracking or make wind generators. who cares about the weapons we only need what is necessary to defend ourselves. which after this presidency might be a hell of a lot anyways
Yes..but no ..HAHA..yes but i didnt mean it like that
the biggest money making corporations in the country are in the weapons industry,They would never support this idea of course.It would mean less funding for them and also it would mean less funding for the military (including pentagon personal and the likes)
less chance of war is less gravy for them.
Having said that i am all for RP !
Originally posted by BillyBoBBizWorth
Damn faulty light switches...
Cant anyone do their job properly.
Well considering the latest defense cuts that amount to over 500 billion under the current Potus which gives new meaning to the word Gut.