It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sharks are another animal not known, until recently, to be able to reproduce by parthenogenesis. In December of 2001, according to New Scientist, in a tank of three female hammerhead sharks, a shark pup suddenly appeared. Scientists argued for years about how the baby had appeared, and in 2007, after analyzing the pup’s DNA, they found that it was the product of only one animal, its mother.
In 2008, after a blacktip shark died, an autopsy revealed that she had been pregnant with a pup resulting from parthenogenesis. As reported by LiveScience, the shark, named Tidbit, had been in captivity for eight years and had no contact with male sharks during that time. DNA confirmed the parthenogenesis hypothesis. All shark pups resulting from parthenogenesis will be female.
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by PrinceDreamer
Where is the baby shark now? I am coming to bring it great tidings of joy....as well as some frankincense and myrrh (I've been told it's appropriate gifts in this sort of situation)
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by PrinceDreamer
Where is the baby shark now? I am coming to bring it great tidings of joy....as well as some frankincense and myrrh (I've been told it's appropriate gifts in this sort of situation)
Lol I nearly make some sort of joke about it too in reference to Mary, how perhaps she was the first shark to walk on land, but I wanted the topic to stay on focus rather than get 300 pages of scriptures quoted at me but it does beg a question, if this is possible within certain species of animals who is to say that perhaps Mary (if the stories are true, and I know it is a stretch of imagination for the non religious of us all) was perhaps not a genetic deviation
Interesting thought! Of course I'd imagine you'd get a lot of flack from the Biblical Literalists about that theory.....and the scientists would probably be pretty skeptical since (as far as I know) Parthenogenesis births have never been known to happen in mammals....Then again, it's certainly a plausible theory within the bounds of what we know about biology......it happens with some animals...why not us from time to time?
Originally posted by Thalestris
Interesting thought! Of course I'd imagine you'd get a lot of flack from the Biblical Literalists about that theory.....and the scientists would probably be pretty skeptical since (as far as I know) Parthenogenesis births have never been known to happen in mammals....Then again, it's certainly a plausible theory within the bounds of what we know about biology......it happens with some animals...why not us from time to time?
This is true, it's not known of naturally in mammals but it can be induced, much like the cloning process. And yes, the progeny would all be females.
'Virgin birth' mammal rewrites rules of biology
Parthenogenesis Wiki