It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by korathin
Romney has zero chance of winning period. He is just a soulless psychopath.
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by korathin
Romney has zero chance of winning period. He is just a soulless psychopath.
In the USA that gives you a very good chance of winning.
Interesting to see the media now changing their mind - Iowa WAS important (because Paul didn't win). It's all rather sickening.
Originally posted by mike dangerously
So,Iowa was threatened: Vote for Ron Paul and your Caucus will be considered meaningless.Yeah,that's the American Way...
Originally posted by EvilAxis
The People (represented by Ron Paul) versus the Corporatocracy (cheer-lead by the Mainsteam Media). It's starting to get interesting.
The old lies and spin wear thin as the age of the internet kicks in.
That self-proclaimed bastion of impartiality, the BBC World Service, has devoted plenty of airtime to "reporting" and speculating upon the outcome of this contest. Almost invariably, (including a couple of nights ago) Ron Paul's name is not uttered. He does not exist. Not once have they reported his leading position in the polls. How will they handle it if he wins? Which will it be - no further reporting of the Iowa Caucus or "We apologise, there is a fault. The winner is a nameless person whose image and voice cannot be registered with our equipment"?
edit on 3-1-2012 by EvilAxis because: (no reason given)
Of the presidential candidates, only Ron Paul addresses the Constitution’s demise.Yet, the electorate is concerned with matters unimportant by comparison.
Propagandized 24/7 by the Ministry of Truth, Americans are not sufficiently aware of their plight to elect Ron Paul president. It might be too late for even a President Ron Paul to turn things around.
A president has no power unless his government supports him. What prospect would President Ron Paul have of getting his appointees confirmed by the Senate? The military/security complex is not going to vacate power. Powerful monied interests would block his appointments. If he persisted in being a problem for the Establishment, he would be victimized by a scandal and fail to be reelected if not forced to resign.
Originally posted by P12SOLD
Romney and Santorum got 60,000 thousand votes between them. Ron got 26,000. I like Paul, but its fairly obvious from this polling the older generation of Republicans, are not as interested in Paul, as the other two. Its just an example of how ignorant the majority of Republicans are to the real issues.. By voting for Romney and less so Santorum, these Republicans do want another corporate shill in the White house.
Originally posted by Aeonflux
I smell a rat, something not right with the votes, this would have been a landslide victory for Ron Paul