posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 06:07 AM
Keep in mind that the two major communist revolutions in the 20th century occurred in regions where the productive forces of capitalism were not fully
developed, i.e. China and Russia. The whole point of Marxism is an analysis of history based on antagonism between classes - the bourgeoisie emerged
as the dominant ruling class in western Europe via revolutionary struggle against the feudal aristocracy; this is commonly known as the democratic
revolution or bourgeois revolution. In Asia, Africa, and Latin America, the march of history skipped from semi-feudalism (feudal economic backwardness
altered by the influence of capitalist imperialism) to proletarian revolution, forgoing the initial bourgeois revolution against feudalism. Thus many
elements of the anti-monarchist (in the case of the USSR) or anti-colonial (in the case of the PRC) bourgeoisie were integrated into the new
proletarian state, leading to the rapid collapse of socialism and rapid restoration of capitalism.
It's also important to remember that class struggle continues after the formation of a socialist state (the notion that a socialist state is the
final permanent end-result of proletarian revolution is a distortion of Marxism) this is what happened in China in the 60s as the mass of workers,
peasants, students, etc. attempted to spear-head the struggle of transitioning from socialism to communism by rebelling against the
bureaucrat-bourgeoisie within the communist party. (The new ruling class comprised of the former intelligentsia)