It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fleabit
Why can't we accept that all(ALL) of these FO's are manned by us not little green men? I mean why even call them UFO's, its stupid. If you see something up in air , ITS made by us and you have no right to know any other detail about it. And don't use the idea that your a tax payer and have the right to know about some military craft. All your going to get is a picture . But i guess since all you have is a picture your going to allow your imagination to take over on an image you know very well is man made.
Isn't all this a bit childish?
Childish? Not at all. And there is a lot more to it than a picture. For you folks who claim you know that UFOs don't exist, I'd love to hear your explanations on some of the more prominent cases out there.
Tell you what, start with this one. Tehran 1976 UFO Incident
There are a lot of resources for this one alone. If you can satisfactorily explain away the reaction of fighter jets to this object (EME effects), the sightings by professionals and civilians, the radar returns, the maneuvars, etc.. heck, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion!
But no... no one who makes these sorts of claims.. that they know UFOs do not exist, can ever approach the cases that have solid evidence, and explain them away. They won't even try. They, probably like you will do, just ignore them completely. It's easier to discredit UFOs when you attack the fuzzy dots and ridiculous claims, rather than focusing on the sightings with solid fact behind them, right?
Originally posted by PeachesEnRegalia
It IS crucially important to train yourself as an observer though.
The lights are a form of light pillar and are produced by flat plate shaped ice crystals in layers of ice fog above the city.
Why do the lines of light converge on the zenith?
The diagram at right shows rays from just one nearby city light shining upwards onto crystals at different heights.
Only crystals on a column roughly midway between the light and the observer give a reflection into the eye because the small crystal mirrors are nearly horizontal and the incident and reflected rays must make equal angles to the crystal faces.
The higher the crystal, the more closely does the reflected ray come from the direction of the zenith. Therefore, when there is a cloud of crystals, their reflections appear as a line of light that points directly overhead, the zenith.
Why are the lines broken?
That night there must have been several layers of crystals at different heights over the city with zones in between them either without ice crystals or with crystals that were not specially oriented.
I don't claim UFO's don't exist. What I claim is why do you(all alien blind believers) claim most unidentified flying objects are associated with ONLY strange alien technology. Why????
And your Tehran UFO Incident , is a perfect example. The majority of us believe all known technology is the peak of human capabilities or capacity. Which is completely false. Everything we use today was invented decades back. And many more unknown alternative inventions were suppressed from the public's eye .
The Iranian fighter pilots knowledge was limited to what was only available for Iran in'76. They saw something that was beyond there capabilities. And? Doesn't mean its extraterrestrial. Again "alien propaganda" at its best ,brain washing the masses. The fact that alien technology is the first option ,let alone an option , is a sad joke.
I'll give you proof that aliens haven't been cruzin around our human skies. Because its almost impossible to attempt and master space travel.
Originally posted by fleabit
I don't claim UFO's don't exist. What I claim is why do you(all alien blind believers) claim most unidentified flying objects are associated with ONLY strange alien technology. Why????
They do?
I think most clear-thinking UFO believers, are actually quite skeptical of most sightings themselves. You are letting the few extreme cases on this sort of board influence your opinion of UFO believers. I believe almost all sightings are mistaken identity, I believe in perhaps 1% of abduction claims, and 0% of crop circles. Yet I still firmly believe we are being visited by something that is not ours. There is too much evidence to ignore.
And your Tehran UFO Incident , is a perfect example. The majority of us believe all known technology is the peak of human capabilities or capacity. Which is completely false. Everything we use today was invented decades back. And many more unknown alternative inventions were suppressed from the public's eye .
The Iranian fighter pilots knowledge was limited to what was only available for Iran in'76. They saw something that was beyond there capabilities. And? Doesn't mean its extraterrestrial. Again "alien propaganda" at its best ,brain washing the masses. The fact that alien technology is the first option ,let alone an option , is a sad joke.
Ah, the old "it's secret black technology, not UFOs!" argument. The fallback for people who refuse to believe it might be possible something is here. We don't have technology TODAY that can do what that craft was reported to do. And you think they had it in 1976? Some country has had EME equipment that can completely disable all fighter jet weapons and instrumentation, and oddly, the only time they use it, is one single time in a non-combat situation? Yea.. that makes a lot of sense.
Apparently we would fly black tech over foreign countries, risking losing our best equipment to enemies, and provoking a war. Also seemingly it's normal to fly our most secret and amazing tech over American cities for extended periods of time.
Look.. we don't have the tech displayed in many sightings. Massive craft that make no sound and then accelerate away at high speeds.. we don't have that tech. I don't think you appreciate the science behind what would be needed to keep such a massive craft silently in the air. They had a show on this once.. the power required would be astronomical. We do not have this technology. If we had the tech attributed to these craft, you'd see it in use, either for sale.. or used in our wars. They are not.. apparently we just fly them around to screw with people's heads. But I am used to this comeback.. it's the last bastion of defense always, for a sighting that can't be shrugged off with another explanation. Once everyone else fails, the "it's black technology!" is always thrown out by non-believers. Because it's impossible to disprove. Even if it makes no sense, it's the comfy hideout used for those who refuse to accept we not be the dominant species in our little solar neck of the woods.
I'll give you proof that aliens haven't been cruzin around our human skies. Because its almost impossible to attempt and master space travel.
Almost impossible? What does that mean? Either it's possible, or it's not. You are a clever fellow though, to know exactly what is possible and what is not! I imagine you are a Mensa member, whose insights put Einstein to shame, right?
A few hundred years ago, flight was impossible. Going to the moon was laughable. And yet here we are. That's a tiny blip of time... a blink of an eye, for the age of even our solar system. You honestly think in 10,000 years, given the discoveries we've made in a mere 200 years, this wouldn't be possible to do? Or possibly child's play even? We already are finding in quantum physics, that manipulating an atom in one location can effect another even billions of miles away. We are infants in science. Of all the lame excuses for lack of visitation, that one always makes me laugh. Well, that and "Omg why would they need lights?" Those are kind of neck-and-neck for me, in lame excuses.
And for someone who says they are not saying they think UFOs don't exist, well.. I think you are pretty much saying just that.
P.S. Even as a believer, I appreciate this sort of thread. Pity most people won't read it before creating an account to post 'blurry dot # 1,576,190.'edit on 16-12-2011 by fleabit because: (no reason given)
No, UFO balloon blimp!
originally posted by: dan121212
a reply to: elevenaugust
all your images are showing is that these are clearly not ufo's and would never be mistaken for ufo's by any of us here