It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by PrimalRed
Hey genius, who is not respecting you rights? Did i tell you to shut up or force you to stop talking?
Don't like the topic of this thread? Don't like the criticism of this church? Then you have the right not to participate in discussion. This couple can find another church to go to, and you can find another thread. Simple.
Originally posted by nh_ee
reply to post by Southern Guardian
No offense to the people of Pike County KY but one always needs to assess the source of any and all information.
According to Wikipedia Pike county is a "Dry" county, or a "Moist" county in that there exist two town/locals in the entire country that sell alcohol.
So if the local inhabitants haven't progressed beyond the prohibition era as it pertains to the evils of alcohol then the nature of this article doesn't at all surprise me.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Let me repeat this to you again. I believe that racists are backwards, they disgust me. You disgust me.
Originally posted by PrimalRed
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by PrimalRed
Hey genius, who is not respecting you rights? Did i tell you to shut up or force you to stop talking?
Don't like the topic of this thread? Don't like the criticism of this church? Then you have the right not to participate in discussion. This couple can find another church to go to, and you can find another thread. Simple.
Hello Mr.Strawman my name is logic, have we met?
Originally posted by Misoir
That was a good thing? The Feds had no right to tell a state what they could do with their marriage laws. There is not one amendment in the Constitution that says "everyone has a right to marry who they want", so where did the Feds get the power to enforce this 'equality' on the states? They pulled it out of their rear end, per usual.
Originally posted by Misoir
Are you an elitist or what? I suppose everyone is equal so long as they agree with you but when they have a dissenting point of view they are "stubbornly living backwards". Everyone should know it is true by now; the most intolerant people are the intellectually liberalized. The multikulti group think has sure done a number on our society.
Originally posted by Misoir
I would never date outside my race, I even try and stick to my own ethnicity but there are few Hungarians in America. I am a racialist (not racist, don't know the difference look it up), proud of it and would never change for anything in the world. There are different ethnicities, tribes, races, etc... For a reason, it makes the whole world diverse and unique. But I guess you will only be happy once every race, or more specifically the white race, commits genocide against itself and everyone is brown, uninteresting, un-unique, and all the lowest common denominator.
Originally posted by Misoir
As for this church, I think it is perfectly fine what they did. It is a private institution and they have the right to make their own choices on who they want in there. If the interracial couple dislike it so much go elsewhere, no one is holding a gun to their head and telling them they have to go to that one specific church. Besides, why would you want to go somewhere you know you are not welcome?
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Let me repeat this to you again. I believe that racists are backwards, they disgust me. You disgust me.
fond of yourself, much?
Originally posted by PrimalRed
reply to post by Southern Guardian
I fully support what the church is doing, they have the right to have their own rules within reason