Was there an atomic war roughly 10,000 years ago?

reply to post by luciddream


Impossible? Maybe there were other weapons used, or maybe it was a natural response to the violence of the earths inhabitants. Its pure speculation, but impossible is not a word I would use. We simply do not know, or are deliberately not told, everything about nature and our past technological achievements..

Thread reported as a HOAX.

You might find this interesting.

It was in that timeframe that the Bimini Road was discovered in the Atlantic Ocean. Whether this is actually a road or natural, geologic erosion is being hotly debated. Many people believe this to be the actual portion of Atlantis that Cayce was referring to.

Cayce maintained that Atlantis was an ancient civilization that was technologically superior to even our own and that its last surviving islands have disappeared somewhere in the Atlantic ocean some ten thousand years ago.

Cayce revealed that the size of Atlantis was equal to that of Europe, including Asia in Europe. He saw visions of this continent of the past which had gone through three major periods of division; the first two occurred around 15,600 B.C., when the mainland was divided into islands. The three main islands of Atlantis Cayce named were Poseida, Og and Aryan.

He said the people of Atlantis had constructed giant laser-like crystals for power plants, and that these were responsible for the second destruction of the land. Cayce blamed the final destruction of Atlantis and the disintegration of their culture on greed and lust. But before the legendary land disappeared under the waves, Cayce revealed that there was an exodus of many Atlanteans to ancient Egypt. Cayce attributed the Biblical Great Flood of Noah to be a result of the sinking of the last huge remnants of Atlantis.
near-death.com...

reply to post by longlostbrother


I'm afraid it isn't that simple to discredit the entire theory based on one hoax text. Ancient accounts of the wars between 'gods and man' are not just in the Mahabharata. The Vedic literature of ancient India is filled with many descriptions of flying machines. There is also a sanskit writing on giving the description on building a vimana which according to further study holds merit. That is only one example. Neither is the evidence of vitrification a myth.

Often in ancient literature the word "chariot" was also referring to crafts that could not be explained using technological terminology.

One cannot discredit this theory based on one manipulated translation that 'may' have been incorrect or a single hoax when looking at the plethora of evidence elsewhere.

www.vigyanprasar.gov.in...

www.burlingtonnews.net...

blog.hallofthegods.org...

www.main.org...

www.unomaha.edu...

Originally posted by Egyptia
reply to post by longlostbrother

 

I'm afraid it isn't that simple to discredit the entire theory based on one hoax text. Ancient accounts of the wars between 'gods and man' are not just in the Mahabharata. The Vedic literature of ancient India is filled with many descriptions of flying machines. There is also a sanskit writing on giving the description on building a vimana which according to further study holds merit. That is only one example. Neither is the evidence of vitrification a myth.

Often in ancient literature the word "chariot" was also referring to crafts that could not be explained using technological terminology.

One cannot discredit this theory based on one manipulated translation that 'may' have been incorrect or a single hoax when looking at the plethora of evidence elsewhere.

www.vigyanprasar.gov.in...

www.burlingtonnews.net...

blog.hallofthegods.org...

www.main.org...

www.unomaha.edu...

One can ABSOLUTELY discount any text relating to nuclear war, aka what the OP claims is in the mahabarata.

There's NO evidence in there for that, and the only, "evidence" ever presented is hoaxed. The OP is a hoax, and the concept of ancient nuclear war is a hoax... now, if you want to discuss ancient religious fairy tales about "flying machines" knock yourself out, but there's NO evidence, other than hoaxed texts and lies on conspiracy theory sites, for ancient nuclear war - thus the OP s a hoax.

EDIT.

I see you're referencing other hoaxed crap as well.

VYMAANIDASHAASTRA AERONAUTICS is not ancient, but was just a bunch of crap made up in the early 20th century.

The thesis paper about the film Contact is hardly evidence, more like fanciful jibber jabber...Contact is horrible film btw., so... double points deducted...

This: www.main.org... is just someone speculating, without adding any real evidence of anything...

This blog.hallofthegods.org... Is full of debunked hoaxed crap, some from the same source that hoaxed the OPs writings......

The OP is still a hoax and there is ZERO evidence for ancient nuclear war...

Originally posted by longlostbrother
Thread reported as a HOAX.

How does one report a thread that postulates a question as being a hoax? This thread is about the theories with regards to the question being posed. Now if the thread stated that this theory was absolute fact then one could argue that it was a hoax.

We have theories based on unexplained evidence that can lend credence to the possibility of this theory and ancient texts that are also worthy of study with regards to the said same theory.

The whole point of this is to expand one's awareness and dare to try and connect the unexplained mysteries related to our ancient past with research. They can only be theories at this point but they are worthy of study and contemplation.

Originally posted by Egyptia

Originally posted by longlostbrother
Thread reported as a HOAX.

How does one report a thread that postulates a question as being a hoax? This thread is about the theories with regards to the question being posed. Now if the thread stated that this theory was absolute fact then one could argue that it was a hoax.

We have theories based on unexplained evidence that can lend credence to the possibility of this theory and ancient texts that are also worthy of study with regards to the said same theory.

If I said to you:



Is Jesus a lesbian?

John 3:16 says, "Jesus was a woman, who like having sex with other women".



You would RIGHTLY say I was perpetuating a HOAX because the bible doesn't say that, does it?
The same goes for the OP.

The OP quotes something fictional, attributes it to a false source and then says, "discuss".

The OP is a hoax.

reply to post by longlostbrother

The OP quotes something fictional, attributes it to a false source and then says, "discuss".

Agreed, he quoted something entirely fictional which would then make 'that' impossible to be discussed. Your absolutely correct about that fact longlostbrother.

Originally posted by Egyptia
reply to post by longlostbrother

 

The OP quotes something fictional, attributes it to a false source and then says, "discuss".

Agreed, he quoted something entirely fictional which would then make 'that' impossible to be discussed. Your absolutely correct about that fact longlostbrother.

That's my only point... either be clear you're just discussing made up stuff, for fun and as a mental exercise, or whatever, or discuss facts... don't conflate them, and don't justify deliberate hoaxes, as in the text quoted by the OP, by saying, "oh hoaxes are ok if they inspire discussion"...

unless you want to discuss hoaxes I guess :p