It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AllUrChips
These tablets are just like the sumerian tablets, not verifiable. They are no different than "the ten commandments" or the mormon tablets that smith guy wrote or whatever Meaning they are a matter of unverifiable opinion. And the mexicans will milk this in every way they can for all they can.edit on 24-11-2011 by AllUrChips because: (no reason given)edit on 24-11-2011 by AllUrChips because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Very interesting!
The Comalcalco brick is also odd in that the molded or inscribed faces of the bricks were probably laid facing inward or covered with stucco, suggesting they were not meant to be seen.
Read more: latino.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
Better link.
The coming year will be very interesting whether you believe in prophecies or not. There is so much on the verge of happening that we're sure to see some significant change in the world, whether that change be positive or negative is still unknown, but either way, 2012 is sure to be a year of change.
In fact, the third glyph on the brick seems to read as the verb huli, "he/she/it arrives."
Originally posted by lostinspace
I find this passage very interesting.
In fact, the third glyph on the brick seems to read as the verb huli, "he/she/it arrives."
start.toshiba.com...
The explanation of the end of the 13th Baktun from the Mayans has always been, “The fifth sun comes to an end.” This new detail about the arrival of someone or something makes this even more intriguing.
Originally posted by kdog1982
Originally posted by lostinspace
I find this passage very interesting.
In fact, the third glyph on the brick seems to read as the verb huli, "he/she/it arrives."
start.toshiba.com...
The explanation of the end of the 13th Baktun from the Mayans has always been, “The fifth sun comes to an end.” This new detail about the arrival of someone or something makes this even more intriguing.
"It" arrives from the sky,13,000 years later.
Just wondering what it,or he/she is.
A comet, asteroid,an alien being?
Many questions to ponder.
Not the end,but awaiting the arrival of something.
Maybe a promise of a return from a previous visitation.edit on 25-11-2011 by kdog1982 because: (no reason given)
I have to disagree that Mayanists have kept the Tortuguero passage to themselves (ourselves), forn whatever reason. I posted the translation here a few days ago in a very matter-of-fact way, which should indicate that quite the opposite is true. And, anyway, it's not the way our field works. I'm certain that if anyone had ever posed the question "Do any Maya inscriptions mention 2012?" to us active epigraphers (me, Houston, Martin, Mathews, Grube, Zender, Lacadena, Macleod, etc.), that we would immediately say, "look at Tortuguero Monument 6." In these days of email, discussion boards, and frequent open workshops like we have at the Maya Meetings, there are endless opportunities to acquire, exchange and disseminate information about this stuff, and that's a wonderful thing. So, there is no "closed shop" in some ivory tower. Remember, we're still in the midst of a remarkable time that continues to assess the windfall that came from the recent decipherment, and there's lots of catching up to do. Frankly, the Tortuguero passage, buried in lots of other data, hasn't been a huge deal to most of us because it is damaged and very, very ambiguous. There really isn't a whole lot to say about it when all is said and done. And even if the glyphs there were clear and legible, no Mayanist I know honestly believes that the Classic Maya foresaw something that might actually come true in our day and age. David
The deity Bolon Yokte K'u is shown here to have had a consistent association with underworld, conflict, and war from the beginning of the Classic period into Colonial times…The identification of Bolon Yokte K'u on the "Vase of the Seven Gods" underscores its importance as one of the gods that were present during the creation of the present world.
Frankly, the Tortuguero passage, buried in lots of other data, hasn't been a huge deal to most of us because it is damaged and very, very ambiguous. There really isn't a whole lot to say about it when all is said and done. And even if the glyphs there were clear and legible, no Mayanist I know honestly believes that the Classic Maya foresaw something that might actually come true in our day and age.
Originally posted by Lebowski achiever
reply to post by PerfectPerception
That's interesting info but I am a bit skeptical about the symbols on the Roman bricks being the same as the olmec bricks. Why are there no pics of the symbols on the bricks? I also don't see it mentioned anywhere else but this website. It sounds a bit too good to be true, to be honest.
Neil Steede, an archaeologist working on the site, studied almost 5,000 bricks, and photographed the inscriptions he found on about 1,500 of them. Most of the symbols or inscriptions have been interpreted as masons' signs. The really curious thing is that these marks turn out to be virtually identical to the masons' marks used by the Romans, half a world away.
we all had our hearts set on seeing this ruin because it is so different. Unlike all the others built of rock, Comalcalco is built of Roman-like bricks that are thinner than regular brick and thicker than tile.
We have read that the bricks have symbols on the back similar to those made in Rome; symbols that closely resemble those of the Masonic Brotherhood.
What makes all this so interesting is the similarities we see between the artifacts of all these Mesoamerica ruins and some of the physical characteristics of the people carved in stone to the people and structures of Rome, Greece, Egypt, and Africa. Surely there was travel between these continents long before recorded history.
Clyde Winters and Neil Steede explored the iconography of the symbols carved in Comalcalco bricks in some detail. Winters, an expert on Olmec script, which pre-dates the rise of the Maya, quickly recognized that one particular brick (T1 452 R16) was very special, since it had both Olmec and Maya script side by side.
Winters translated the Olmec script, and Steede worked on the Maya script, independently, before comparing notes. Their work showed that the two scripts told the same tale. The left hand side was essentially a translation of the right hand side; the brick was bilingual!
Winters, an expert on Olmec script, which pre-dates the rise of the Maya, quickly recognized that one particular brick (T1 452 R16) was very special, since it had both Olmec and Maya script side by side.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Very interesting!
The Comalcalco brick is also odd in that the molded or inscribed faces of the bricks were probably laid facing inward or covered with stucco, suggesting they were not meant to be seen.
Read more: latino.foxnews.com...
Comalcalco was a major Mayan port city that was believed to have flourished between A.D 700 to A.D 900.
In 1977 and 1978 the National Institute of Anthropology and History excavated the site and discovered that it was made up entirely of these bricks. And the site is HUGE. What they also found was that approximately 3% of the bricks had inscriptions on them, on the INSIDE. In a study conducted by Mexican archeologist Neil Steede of the National Institute of Anthropology and History, he discovered that 3,671 bricks had inscriptions. Of these bricks, 2,129 had Mayan inscriptions on them. But 499 of the bricks were found to have completely out of place inscriptions. 13.6% of the bricks were found to have Old World inscriptions on them. These inscriptions include writing in Arabic, Phoenician, Libyan, Egyptian, Ogam, Tifinag, Chinese, Burmese, and Paliburmese. In all, about 17.3% of the bricks were inscribed with different languages, but if they had any Mayan inscriptions on them, they were designated to the Mayan inscription pile. Other bricks from this site had drawings on them, and 308 of the bricks were completely unknown and indecipherable.
In 1977 and 1978 the National Institute of Anthropology and History excavated the site and discovered that it was made up entirely of these bricks. And the site is HUGE. What they also found was that approximately 3% of the bricks had inscriptions on them, on the INSIDE.
In a study conducted by Mexican archeologist Neil Steede of the National Institute of Anthropology and History, he discovered that 3,671 bricks had inscriptions. Of these bricks, 2,129 had Mayan inscriptions on them. But 499 of the bricks were found to have completely out of place inscriptions. 13.6% of the bricks were found to have Old World inscriptions on them.
These inscriptions include writing in Arabic, Phoenician, Libyan, Egyptian, Ogam, Tifinag, Chinese, Burmese, and Paliburmese. In all, about 17.3% of the bricks were inscribed with different languages, but if they had any Mayan inscriptions on them, they were designated to the Mayan inscription pile. Other bricks from this site had drawings on them, and 308 of the bricks were completely unknown and indecipherable.
According to Steede, all of the bricks were carefully photographed, and copies sent to the Epigraphic Society of San Diego, California, where the languages were identified and verified. Several of the bricks had Mayan inscriptions and another language—typical translations. Some of the bricks were decorated with elephants, and other creatures not indigenous to the Americas.