It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by mockrock
This chap has been treating people, no?
Claims to have treated 8,000 people. What happened to them? Were they cured? Where are his documents or some form of substantiating records?
Burzynski Patient Stories
or the site run by his patients Here.
And Here are the actual records of some patients that have chosen to share. Complete with MRI's and Pathology reports.
Let me know what you think.edit on 18-11-2011 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jondave
If there is a cure, how could anyone hold it back.
Originally posted by Phage
Sounds like "big pharma" would be interested in something like this.
Antineoplastons are given orally or by injection into a vein. The duration of treatment usually ranges from eight to twelve months. A year of treatment can cost from $30,000 to $60,000, depending on the type of treatment, number of consultations, and the need for surgery to implant a catheter for drug delivery.
Maybe if the results of the "clinical trials" could be reproduced they would be.
Although some proponents of antineoplaston therapy have suggested that the reviews of this treatment by conventional cancer specialists are biased by mistrust of alternative therapies, even some prominent figures in the field of alternative medicine have reservations about antineoplastons. According to Dr. Andrew Weil, "Over the years, Dr. Burzynski claims to have treated more than 8,000 patients, but his success rates are unknown. His Web site states only that he has helped 'many' people. If antineoplaston therapy works, we should have scientific studies showing what percentage of patients treated have survived and for how long, as well as evidence showing how Dr. Burzynski's method stacks up against conventional cancer treatment…. Until we have credible scientific evidence showing what antineoplastons are, how they act in the body, and what realistic expectations of treatment with them might be, I see no reason for any cancer patient to take this route."
Source
Dr. Weil is a harsh critic of many conventional cancer treatments.edit on 11/18/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)edit on 11/18/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)