posted on Nov, 17 2011 @ 02:20 AM
Yep, this is about Occupy. I've noticed from watching both media feeds with commentary, and the Occupy feeds of the recent evictions that they are
both telling very different stories. Yet they both agree, that peace is being preserved. They do not however agree on the amount of stiff treatment
from police, and the amount of illegal activities going on in the area. MSM has mentioned drugs and so many other bad things about Occupy, and
ignored the peacefulness of the movement.
This concerns me because future groups of protesters, no matter what organization will start to realize, why be peaceful if it just gets you slandered
and swept aside? Is big business trying to undermine these movements to preserve their excessive way of life? I think so. Do you think it will
result in less than peaceful protesting in the future? I can see that happening eventually. The people are certainly being swayed by MSM, which is
owned by the machine, of that I am sure. They are effectively tyeing the hands of anyone wanting to make a peaceful statement or revolution. At what
point will people start to realize that peace is not the best answer to making a statement, and when can we expect the peacefulness of our movements
that follow the archetypes put forth in earlier times to cease? Will the "hands" of peace keep being tied tighter and tighter, leaving no other
recourse except for war?
edit on 17-11-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)