Obama and Company offer another Swipe at the 2nd Amendment

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by ConspiraCity

 

That could be amended to "That if you are caught discharing a firearm in a national park in the direction of campgoers you will be subjected to siezure of your weapons and face arrest on site along with a hefty ($10,000+) fine"! Take the fine money and reinvest it back into the park to improve it.

Could something like that be agreed upon? Tighten and stricten the laws.

edit on 27-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

Again, retort with no comprehension.
There are already laws covering this.

You, have no clue.

reply to post by macman


No, no new laws would be needed as you don't need to pass a new law thus in return wasting both the legislatures and the taxpayer money and time on passing a law that already exists just to put up a few signs and to redo a few pamphlets.

What do you not get?

What about something along these lines for guns like they do for coyotes, bears, cougars, mountain lions, lynxs, jaguars :

www.fieldandstream.com...

Or is this too much of a nanny state? I'd like to see you try to takedown a full grown coyote by yourself! Field & Stream is perhaps one of the like top 3 magazines that all hunters prescribe to and are loyal to and get alot of their safety info from or is F&S in on the nanny state plan to by being a tool of the leftist media?

Hypocrisy of the highest order! Burn!

Hook, line, sinker, SUNK!

reply to post by macman


Complete comprehension because I completely understood what I was posting and it's obvious that you cannot so stop trying to challenge me it is a losing proposition.

He is not going after the 2nd! You want a real story, find out who's pushing this story, how do they stand to benefit and why are they doing it!

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

No, no new laws would be needed as you don't need to pass a new law thus in return wasting both the legislatures and the taxpayer money and time on passing a law that already exists just to put up a few signs and to redo a few pamphlets.

What do you not get?

What about something along these lines for guns like they do for coyotes, bears, cougars, mountain lions, lynxs, jaguars :

www.fieldandstream.com...

Or is this too much of a nanny state? I'd like to see you try to takedown a full grown coyote by yourself! Field & Stream is perhaps one of the like top 3 magazines that all hunters prescribe to and are loyal to and get alot of their safety info from or is F&S in on the nanny state plan to by being a tool of the leftist media?

Hypocrisy of the highest order! Burn!

Hook, line, sinker, SUNK!

edit on 28-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

Honestly, your retorts are the ramblings of someone who is just typing to type.
You make incoherent retorts, add off topic statements and pull nonsense out of your butt.

You make no sense what so ever.

There is no need for new laws. There are already laws in place.

And what on God's Green Earth does a Field and Stream Article have to do with the topic of "Closing off public lands to shooters"?

I do hunt, and Coyotes are on that list.
I do not need a warning sign to tell me that wild animals are in the wild.
It appears that you need this as common sense seems to have gone bye bye.

Please, stay in Jersey. Place as many signs as you want. I think it is necessary to keep you and others like you safe.

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

Complete comprehension because I completely understood what I was posting and it's obvious that you cannot so stop trying to challenge me it is a losing proposition.

He is not going after the 2nd! You want a real story, find out who's pushing this story, how do they stand to benefit and why are they doing it!

edit on 28-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

It does not matter who is pushing the story.
You are about the biggest failure on the internet, in regards to debating.
I have never come across someone so pompous and arrogant to think that they have won any argument or debate just be simple stating that they are the smartest person in the forum.
You really need to brush up on your social and debating skills, they lack greatly.

But, I know that your retort to this will be a regurgitation of you are the smartest, self proclaimed winner or something of that sort.