Obama and Company offer another Swipe at the 2nd Amendment

reply to post by ConspiraCity


Does this mean that you agree with the following :
This is to merely ban where a gun can and cannot be discharged when it pertains to public parks.?

reply to post by TheImmaculateD1


Yes, and that act of governing where a firearm can and can not be fired is a law that pertains to firearms, Thus it is a gun law.

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

Like I said, I will go to a campground that you use, get a gun and start firing on the campground right next to your encampment and since you'd be threatening my 2nd Amendment rights you can't complain when I'm firing off 100 rounds every 5 minutes for the rest of the night, see how far something can be taken? Obviously I'm not going to unload clip after clip inside of a loaded campground but you see how easy it is to shake someone's foundation?

You again?
Blah Blah Blah.
For someone that can't even comprehend Keynesian Economics, you sure do think you got this pinned down, huh?
If you were to set up camp next to me, start popping off shots, and if you were "normal" and speaking to you did not end it, I would pack up and leave.
But, alas, since you have never been out west, never gone camping, probably never shot a firearm, nor been in any situation like this, I think it is safe to say that reality and logic trumps your idiotic "what if" any day of the week.

reply to post by macman


This has nothing to do with Kenyensian economics so quit with this blatant lie and everytime you do it weakens your case that much further.

Been to Albuquerque, NM 3 times, been camping like twice.

I don't care for the time zones as the time zone somehow and mysteriously doesn't mean a new different nation as we are all The USA!

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

This has nothing to do with Kenyensian economics so quit with this blatant lie and everytime you do it weakens your case that much further.

Been to Albuquerque, NM 3 times, been camping like twice.

edit on 26-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

www.abovetopsecret.com...
You have no clue as to Keynesian Economics, and retorted it had to do with Obama being from Kenya.
Just as in that thread, you have no clue in this thread either.

Just because you state something is, doesn't make it so.
Stay with the cars, as this seems to be outside your "wheelhouse" of comprehension.


But, if you like, keep responding back, but this time, maybe cover everything from my statement, and not just the one thing that has you all bent out of shape.

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

This has nothing to do with Kenyensian economics so quit with this blatant lie and everytime you do it weakens your case that much further.

Been to Albuquerque, NM 3 times, been camping like twice.

I don't care for the time zones as the time zone somehow and mysteriously doesn't mean a new different nation as we are all The USA!

edit on 26-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

It is an amazing wonder that you weren't hit by some magic bullet traveling a mile to strike you or your car, since you know, there being no magic signs or ropes to stop the opposing magic bullet.

reply to post by macman


In this case what I say is so because the way I structure my sentences, format my wording using a far higher iq then most means what I say especially when it pertains to matters like this is not just some other useless and half brained opinion but is a confirmed fact as I do not deal in theories and only deal in facts and what I say is a fact.

Got it? This is not up for debate nor for continued discussion on an already debunked and shot down claim.

So sorry, try again!

Personally I'd rather see $2 Million of taxpayer dollars spent on new signage, new pamphlets then having to payout nearly 10 times that settling a wrongful death suit because some kid walked right into the line of fire.

reply to post by TheImmaculateD1


Really????

Really, are you serious????

The whole "I'm smarter then you" retort?

Ok then.

You are right, you win.

The self proclamation of "Smartest Man Here" has given you the automatic win you have been searching for.

reply to post by TheImmaculateD1


Oh yeah, smart Guy.

It is "IQ", not "iq".
But, I am just too dumb to convey that correctly to you.

Originally posted by mockrock
reply to post by mockrock

 

If it's about sport and target practice.. laser technology and simulations are safer! If one kid is saved from an accidental shooting by stricter laws.. is that not a price worth paying?

No it is not worth it to me in any stretch of the imagination.

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.-Benjamin Franklin

First it's the shooters
then the people that fly RC planes(because one may crash and hit a picnicker)
then it's dog owners (because a dog may bite a picknicker)
then it's people with ATV's(because a picknicker may get run over)

so now 4 sets of peoples rights have been trampled on in favor of a single set of peoples rights.

And eventually they will come for even the picknickers rights to use the land

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak for me. -Martin Niemöller

reply to post by TheImmaculateD1


How in any way shape or form did you provide any substantial counter points to my hard facts?

You speak of facts yet I see none!

I have provided facts on why nothing should be changed.

Since you seem to love flaunting how "incredibly smart" you are, you should have no problem proving me wrong.

... I guarantee you cant. You are wrong, face the facts.

reply to post by ConspiraCity


I already have proven you wrong it's just that you are inept to actually see it!

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by ConspiraCity

 

I already have proven you wrong it's just that you are inept to actually see it!

ConspiracyCity, don't try to argue with him.


Yeah!!!!!
Roadhouse!


You big dummy.. Didn't you know, his IQ is so off the charts, it can't be measured.

reply to post by Adamanteus


So, let's fire all the Park Rangers (you know they serve as immediate threats to Freedom) close down all medic stations (you are free to bleed to death because acc to The GOP and The SCUM no one deserves free healthcare) close the showers because it's too expensive for the taxpayers, delete the protective fences by allowing people to get mauled time and time again because it's an infringement upon freedom. You see how arrogant and idiotic you sound?

This is not a swipe on the 2nd and this is just a fact.

Obama allows loaded guns in National Parks ;
www.msnbc.msn.com...

It is you that has absolutely no idea what they refer to. Instead of using any lame arsed excuse to attack Obama and this great nation how about actually stand with the people for a change?

Hook, line, sinker, SUNK!

reply to post by macman


Since you have nothing solid to stand on anymore now I obliterated this claim you are levying personal attacks means I got you and have won this one.

This is not a swipe on the 2nd as I've already proven and to continually challenge me on this by resorting to character assassinations means you have been defeated!

Hook, line, sinker, SUNK!

If you commit one more personal character assassination against me you will be reported to the Admins here!

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

Since you have nothing solid to stand on anymore now I obliterated this claim you are levying personal attacks means I got you and have won this one.

This is not a swipe on the 2nd as I've already proven and to continually challenge me on this by resorting to character assassinations means you have been defeated!

Hook, line, sinker, SUNK!

edit on 27-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

What personal attack???
Just responding to your ridiculous crap with more ridiculous crap.

And how do you use the anecdote of "Hook, line and Sinker" and add "Sunk"?
One is in reference to fishing, the other is in reference to ship warfare.

You make no sense.
But, ramble on.

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

If you commit one more personal character assassination against me you will be reported to the Admins here!

edit on 27-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

I am scared!!!!!

Really!!!!!

Oh noes.


In order to assassinate character, one must have it first.

Your constant retorts of crap like "You just don't like a black man in power" and so on does not show much character on your part.

reply to post by macman


Hook means you're lie has been identified!
Line means it's been caught by my line!
Sinker means that's what happened to your claim!
SUNK means your claim has been torpedoed!

You cannot outdebate me, you cannot outwit me, you cannot outmaneuver me as I have shot down each and every claim in every single thread that you and I are participating in means you should actually rethink you items as I continue to prove you wrong time and time again on every single item we debate.

This is no longer up for debate as that ship has sailed and is long out to sea. This is a fact and facts cannot be debated nor challenged as they are clearer then the mid afternoon sunlight. Discussion is over, challenges are over. This is a fact!

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

Hook means you're lie has been identified!
Line means it's been caught by my line!
Sinker means that's what happened to your claim!
SUNK means your claim has been torpedoed!

edit on 27-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

No, I get it.
It just makes no sense.
Haphazardly combining anecdotes is just that.

Your retorts and responses prove nothing, except you can type nonsense.

This law would restrict the rights of people revolving around the 2nd Amendment.

To rehash though, you think that by erected fences, signs and rules, it magically stops bullets.
You want legislation for what if's and might be's to quell your bad feelings and insecurities.
You want more laws to protect some, by removing the rights of others.
How very elitist.

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by macman

 

This is no longer up for debate as that ship has sailed and is long out to sea. This is a fact and facts cannot be debated nor challenged as they are clearer then the mid afternoon sunlight. Discussion is over, challenges are over. This is a fact!

edit on 27-11-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

WOW

Did not realize that you were in charge here.

EXCUSE me.

So, Lord TheImmaculateD1, are there any further rules you wish to set forth from on high?