Mexican DoD Acknowledges UFOs in Mexico

reply to post by OneEleven


I like the Dr. Phil comment. I do not know who Jaimie Musson is. So nothing about that struck me as odd..Could you shed a little light on who that is maybe or provide a link to a bio..? That would be awesome of you!

-SAP-

The government came out and told us the deal straight up. No one listened or believed them. The truth didn't say what they wanted to hear so it was dismissed. Again, for clarity, here is the disclosure:

There are things in the sky. We don't know what they are or where they come from or where they go. They appear to be intelligent balls of light. They are a hazard to aerial navigation and can bring down planes so they are to be avoided.

That is it. That is all that is known and all that has bee released.

reply to post by Ookie


All of that maybe true. I was just posting what I have found and how cool those photos are. Something to consider is all, I'm not asking you to believe it or not, or to NOT believe what the gov't tells you. Just giving a little 'food for thought' is all.

-SAP-

Sorry I don't know how to post a link but there's a debunker on YouTube that claims the balls of light are an optical illusion from oil rigs on the ground ?? Also there is quite a few vids of the whole event and a vid of fox news coverage of the story with footage !

Sorry mods still learning all the codes.

-SAP-

the good thing about jaime mausan is he collects all the info and shares it with the rest of us which is a good thing, hes the mexican dr greer in which you have to separate the good material from the not so good

i heard about the so called debunking of that video on how it was oil rigs but how do oil rigs surround an air plane? "debunkers" try to get us to believe their opinion but just like the rest of us they werent there so how can they know for sure

reply to post by saskwatch


Yeah I agree the thing is most of the time they have some form of data to back up what they are trying to explain (not saying that we don't have the data) however everything that we believers have is based on accounts from other people are eye witness testimony.

Not to mention some "contactees" make it easy for people to disregard Ufology altogether as fake and a waste of time. It's kind of frustrating..

-SAP-

Many of us here, some believers included, still seem to treat UFOs as a sort of Schrodinger's Cat; yes they are UFOs but they are not alien craft, making them both IFOs and UFOs at the same time! We have absolutely no idea what it was, but we do know one thing that it wasn't...

Keep a balance, not so open minded that your brain falls out, and not so close minded you starve your brain of oxygen! Just let the sightings, testimonies, radar readings and observed electromagnetic effects do the talking, and go on from there.

reply to post by Morg234


I agree with you. It could be secret gov't craft or ET, or mutidemisonal ect ect. I wasn't saying either way but I do know for sure they are UFOs. Who knows maybe the gov't uses them to ignore private airspace because other gov'ts do not know what they are. Give them the ability to go where they want when they want.

-SAP-

reply to post by SloAnPainful


well they have no reliable data to prove that these are oil rigs flying around, sorry but you have to prove these are oil rigs and they havent done it imo

as far as contactees go there might be some real contactee events but thats not what were talking about here, were talking about a real event with real evidence

reply to post by saskwatch


Right I was just making a point as to how people look at Ufology or other aspects of the study. I agree though there really isnt any proof that these are indeed oil rigs. Which really to me..doesnt make much since..If someone could provide some kind of facts though that would be great...