It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Something For The Christian To Think On

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 04:42 PM
link   
This is to understand the Jubilee calendar.

It is really easy to see this is a very accurate way to know the time of man’s habitation of the earth. The book Jubilees reveals, chapter 4 verse 29, 30 that Adam lived through into the last year of the 19’th Jubilee cycle. That he was 930 years old and we know he was a few months into another year. 19 X49 = 931 and that is when Adam died, in his 931’st year. Then of course BC 3054 was a Jubilee because we find we can go back no further in time than the year BC 3985. 19 Jubilee cycles is exactly 931 yrs. and the first yr. of the next cycle is always a Jubilee. The Jubilee year is the 50’th and always falls the 1’st year of the next recurring cycle of sevens. So actually each Jubilee year then falls 49 years after the last one, it becomes the 50’th only by falling each time the 1’st year of the next cycle and this some have trouble comprehending. It is a recurring cycle of 7 years and our daily calendar is a recurring cycle of days that can not be broken, two great clocks set by God from all eternity past into all eternity future, this Enoch reveals.

Now if we would just go back one Jubilee cycle in time past BC 3985 which we know was the year of Adam and Eve on earth we would now have the habitation of man here more than 6,000 years already.

Let us now go 81 Jubilees, 81x49=3969 down from BC 3985 and that brings us to BC 16. 3985 - 3969 = 16. Now down 16 more and that ends the BC period and so starting with one again we count up through AD 33 and so the 16 yrs and the 33 yrs. Gives us 49. So now we have a total of 82 Jubilees, 82 Jubilees through AD 33. AD 34 of course then is a Jubilee yr. proven to be as was a new beginning for the Gentiles as this is the year the Gospel dispensation went to them and was ended for the Jews. A Jubilee year is always a new beginning as for nothing else the land was to go back to the original family owner.

AD 34 to AD 1994 is 1960 years and exactly 40 Jubilees. The 82 Jubilees to AD 34 and the 40 to 1994 our last Jubilee year makes us 122 Jubilees to 1994 which is 5,978 yrs. 122 x 49 = 5,978 yrs. We only need 22 years added to 5,978 to make 6,000. Now add that to our last Jubilee, 1994 and we get 2016. This cannot miss only + or minus a year at the most. Also the time is to be shortened for the elect’s sake.

So you see if we started time any earlier we would have had 6,000 years quite a few years ago, 1967 to be exact and it would have been all over by now.

Time is short by many ways we can see by all that is around us and I’ve seen nothing in any of Enoch’s writings and others that say it will end precisely at 6,000 yrs. But that is the time set from the beginning and it just may be precisely.

Also we know the Jubilee calendar is properly timed as it falls in sync will all known Jubilee years. BC 1437 the exodus, BC 457 the decree to rebuild and restore Jerusalem and more like when the flood ended it was a Jubilee year, the year after Adam died a Jubilee year, the year after the 70 weeks of years allotted to the Jews, AD 34 and more.

A Jubilee can be found in the Bible, Isaiah 37:30 and 2 Kings 19:29 and you see will 2 years in a row the land was not tilled and that only happens at a land Sabbath and the next year a Jubilee which is also a Sabbath for the land and the year was mid term of King Hezekiah and was BC 702 and this is the only reckoning that will catch that Jubilee chronicled there.

Something to think about.
edit on 7-11-2011 by sibbs because: mispelled



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by sibbs
 




AD 34 to AD 1994 is 1960 years and exactly 40 Jubilees. The 82 Jubilees to AD 34 and the 40 to 1994 our last Jubilee year makes us 122 Jubilees to 1994 which is 5,978 yrs. 122 x 49 = 5,978 yrs. We only need 22 years added to 5,978 to make 6,000. Now add that to our last Jubilee, 1994 and we get 2016. This cannot miss only + or minus a year at the most. Also the time is to be shortened for the elect’s sake.


The next tetrad moon cycle is 2015 during the Jewish feast days.

The Epistle of Barnabas.


Barnabas 15:3
Of the Sabbath He speaketh in the beginning of the creation; And
God made the works of His hands in six days, and He ended on the
seventh day, and rested on it, and He hallowed it.

Barnabas 15:4
Give heed, children, what this meaneth; He ended in six days. He
meaneth this, that in six thousand years the Lord shall bring all
things to an end; for the day with Him signifyeth a thousand years;
and this He himself beareth me witness, saying; Behold, the day of
the Lord shall be as a thousand years. Therefore, children, in six
days, that is in six thousand years, everything shall come to an end.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   
The book of Enoch is not accepted scripture.

I would not try to analyse the end times date. Too many have failed. Wait until you hear the voice of God tell you.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jim Scott
The book of Enoch is not accepted scripture.

I would not try to analyse the end times date. Too many have failed. Wait until you hear the voice of God tell you.


Accepted by whom? Constantine and a group of men he picked to help him decide what should and shouldn't be included in the bible? I believe there could be much truth to every scripture.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jim Scott
The book of Enoch is not accepted scripture.

I would not try to analyse the end times date. Too many have failed. Wait until you hear the voice of God tell you.


Accepted by who?

The church?

Theres passages in the bible that are "accepted" scripture that tell you God is a homicidal maniac...

So why let any "authority" tell you what is accepted and what is not?

What information are they trying to keep you from?

Did you ever wonder?




posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   
All you really have to do is look at Matthew 24 and Revelation 6.
You cannot know the time. But you can know it is near; the reason we are not allowed to know the time is that mankind would fiddle around until the last minute to get it right. That should be the case all the time.
Hence we can know the season, but not the date. Try to date it and you will fail.
DH



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 06:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by SuperiorEd
reply to post by sibbs
 




AD 34 to AD 1994 is 1960 years and exactly 40 Jubilees. The 82 Jubilees to AD 34 and the 40 to 1994 our last Jubilee year makes us 122 Jubilees to 1994 which is 5,978 yrs. 122 x 49 = 5,978 yrs. We only need 22 years added to 5,978 to make 6,000. Now add that to our last Jubilee, 1994 and we get 2016. This cannot miss only + or minus a year at the most. Also the time is to be shortened for the elect’s sake.


The next tetrad moon cycle is 2015 during the Jewish feast days.

The Epistle of Barnabas.


Barnabas 15:3
Of the Sabbath He speaketh in the beginning of the creation; And
God made the works of His hands in six days, and He ended on the
seventh day, and rested on it, and He hallowed it.

Barnabas 15:4
Give heed, children, what this meaneth; He ended in six days. He
meaneth this, that in six thousand years the Lord shall bring all
things to an end; for the day with Him signifyeth a thousand years;
and this He himself beareth me witness, saying; Behold, the day of
the Lord shall be as a thousand years. Therefore, children, in six
days, that is in six thousand years, everything shall come to an end.



Thanks SuperiorEd, that is a great addition to the post. It adds much to the validity.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Jim Scott
 




The book of Enoch is not accepted scripture.

Neither is the book of Jasher, yet it is twice mentioned in the old testament. Who decided it wasn't "canon" after all.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Klassified
 


Early church fathers...

You should read the 60 cannons of the bible... Its quite interesting, they break they're own laws even within their own code... demanding worship from those that are lower on the church ranking system...etc etc..

Hava look

reluctant-messenger.com...




posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 08:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Akragon
 


Yeah, my question was rhetorical. I have read much of what you're speaking of, and yes, they do break they're own laws. Among other things. That's a good link though, I've bookmarked it.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 10:31 AM
link   
It sounds like your following Isaac Newtons footsteps.



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by Jim Scott
 




The book of Enoch is not accepted scripture.

Neither is the book of Jasher, yet it is twice mentioned in the old testament. Who decided it wasn't "canon" after all.





I used to be quite the Jasher advocate - HOWEVER - Jasher sometimes supports, sometime does not support, and sometimes contradicts the Bible. It is worth a read, but it is not reliable.



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Lazarus Short
 


I do understand that it doesn't jive with much of what we know today as "scripture". But nevertheless, those who wrote the books of Joshua and second Samuel seemed to think it was a worthy enough work to mention. And didn't feel the need to recount certain things because Jasher had already done it. And by the christians own standards, the bible is the inerrant and/or inspired word of God. Which begs the question. Why did God leave references to Jasher in accepted canon if it wasn't to be trusted?

I have read Jasher a few times in researching. I can understand why they threw it out. It opens a can of worms the church would rather not deal with.



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 10:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Klassified
 


You have a valid point in a fairly esoteric subject. I have no easy answer, but I would love to see a Panin-style mathematical analysis of the text of Jasher.







 
1

log in

join