It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by arcnaver
American poverty is a very interesting topic. It's amazing what we Americans think living in poverty really is.
How many of those Food Stamp recipients have:
A TV?
More then one TV?
An Xbox or Playstation?
A cell phone?
A smartphone?
More then one car?
An iPod?
An iPad?
A bed to sleep in?
Multiple pairs of clothing?
A roof over their heads?
Now granted, there are those in the United States (bless them) who really do live in poverty and do not have any of that. But just because someone is on Food Stamps, does not mean they are living in poverty by any stretch of the imagination.
Originally posted by Cuervo
Originally posted by arcnaver
American poverty is a very interesting topic. It's amazing what we Americans think living in poverty really is.
How many of those Food Stamp recipients have:
A TV?
More then one TV?
An Xbox or Playstation?
A cell phone?
A smartphone?
More then one car?
An iPod?
An iPad?
A bed to sleep in?
Multiple pairs of clothing?
A roof over their heads?
Now granted, there are those in the United States (bless them) who really do live in poverty and do not have any of that. But just because someone is on Food Stamps, does not mean they are living in poverty by any stretch of the imagination.
Oh... so because they can afford things from GoodWill (which sell most of the things on that list), they aren't poor?!
Look, go ahead a bang the drum about how a poor person should be wearing leaves and coconut shells for clothing before getting food stamps but just remember that the drum you are pounding is the same one they pound when you complain about taxes.
And quit getting your perspective from Heritage.com. They absolutely love to keep reminding people how rich food stamp recipients are because they have a color tv.
Originally posted by Jiggyfly
Seriously though, I wonder how the idea of unbridled competition plays out with a global population level of 12 billion....when people actually have to resort to literally fighting each other for low paying jobs. We're feeling pain already at 7 billion. The numbers are not good. Job growth has already been surpassed by population growth, and there's no compelling reason to think that will change without intervention. That's akin to saying the Cubs will win the World Series again, because they did it before. I'm not holding my breath.
The UN puts us as high as 14 billion in 2100 without a Malthusian check. How are we possibly going to create enough "job creators" to accommodate that generation born in 2075? When every generation adds to the disproportion? Will the unseen hand of the free market make it so?
I think the answer is to aggressively pursue sustainability....but there's nothing in our current economic model that supports that.
Originally posted by DogGod
Thanks for the post. It's nice to see all this in one place. This is one of the saddest things I've seen in my life. And now we are getting into more wars? THAT makes sense.