Rover spots the 'new thing' on Mars

reply to post by Aestheteka


Because life on a totally different gravity, with totally different water and dirt ratios, with totally different materials.... would still select humanity as a form.... That's not how evolution works. Yes yes, it must be humans, and they must be anthropomorphic. Can't just be a simple left over critter of the Permian that may have been on mars. Can't just be some simple worm that's cringed to life some how. No, it Has to be flipping giants? good God is that silly. I'd be more willing to believe there are dolphins on Europa than to believe you at this point. There's more evidence for that than what you're presenting.

With your two mile large buildings you can factor in how life would consider a lumbering multi hundred ton form as naturally selected for the human form. This is not how evolution works, again.


Learn some biology, learn some anthropology, and most importantly, learn some common sense. Because right there are HD photos where you said did not exist, with deep analysis of so-call structure now clearly being sand dunes.... so you talk about giants and footprints? In a place with whirling desert winds eroding away everything that could have been left?

At this point, you no longer are taking evidence to prove something. You're bending evidence to suit your beliefs. This is irrational, and utterly disrespectful to serious discussions on what may have been on mars. Furhtermore, its blatantly ignorant of the data available.


The data speaks for itself. There is no evidence for civilization on mars. Life, yes, there is plenty of proof for it. Proof that it may even still be there. But no proof of civilization. Sorry to burst your bubble, but science and technology trumps myth. Every time. And all proof says Mars never got beyond it's equivalent to the Permian, if anything at all. The last rivers ran dry with the dinosaurs died, and that doesn't leave a whole lot of room for much life of any interest.

reply to post by Aestheteka


...these are not evidence for civilization. That's a cut rock, and another rock. Are you getting desperate now? How do you know some passing by miner ship spotted some gold, so they laser cut it and stole it, leaving? You don't know, and there's no way to know.

There is evidence for life. Lots. But nothing here proves civilization. Civilization means infrastructure, tools, resource collection (where are the strip mines, the gaping holes from oil extraction, the miles of geometric farms?), and most importantly, architecture. You anthropomorphism it by looking at what men have built on man's world. By applying man's view to an unknown world.

How do you not know they built entirely in gelatin? Gelatin is pretty freaking strong once it dries. But it erodes away over time. How do you know they didn't follow a culture that favored death over human's monolithic eternity view? Nothing would be left of them, and maybe they wanted that. How do you know they even built buildings at all? Why do aliens have to build like we do, look like we do, and act like we do? This is nothing short of ignorance, and quite frankly, looking at the clouds and seeing shapes. That doesn't mean someone built them.

Originally posted by Aestheteka
Tracks on Mars.

Those "tracks" look like the marks on most Viking orbiter photos.

More tracks:

And those look like boulder tracks, there are many photos showing things like that, but only on slopping areas, as expected for a rolling boulder track.

I only skimmed through that video, it shows things that have been discussed here, and not one of the ones I saw is evidence of anything.

Here are a few more anomalies which suggest both life and civilization on Mars:

Doorway structure

Timber!!!!

A hole in the side of a mesa doesn't suggest life or civilization, and even if that rock (it really looks like many other rocks seen on the Rovers' photos) was a piece of wood it wouldn't suggest civilization, unless you are talking about a Pinocchio civilization.