It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ecossiepossie
Nothing travels faster than light?Maybe true maybe false.But doesnt darkness travel as fast as light?
The force is strong with you.Not the ironic detecting force though.
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by ecossiepossie
Nothing travels faster than light?Maybe true maybe false.But doesnt darkness travel as fast as light?
What is darkness? Darkness is the absents of light energy. Darkness does not travel it is not an energy. Darkness is what you get when you have no light energy or the light energy is blocked. Sorry I'm not being a wise guy but seriously, that flawed observation means you don't undertsand the most basic science of it.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by steveknows
Reminds me of some high school physics homework I had once. It was a problem concerning heat exchange between two containers. I was working it out with a classmate at his house. Trying to puzzle it out, I remember saying aloud, ‘so if the cold moves down this pipe...’ My classmate was smarter than me, and pulled me up short. ‘There’s no such thing as cold,’ he said. 'There’s only heat.’
Originally posted by ecossiepossie
The force is strong with you.Not the ironic detecting force though.
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by ecossiepossie
Nothing travels faster than light?Maybe true maybe false.But doesnt darkness travel as fast as light?
What is darkness? Darkness is the absents of light energy. Darkness does not travel it is not an energy. Darkness is what you get when you have no light energy or the light energy is blocked. Sorry I'm not being a wise guy but seriously, that flawed observation means you don't undertsand the most basic science of it.
Originally posted by taderhold
reply to post by steveknows
I am not a physicist. Just theorizing. Cannot prove it, as you cannot prove your theory.
Originally posted by taderhold
reply to post by steveknows
Since your critiquing others ability to understand. It is absence, not "absents".