reply to post by HangTheTraitors
...I cannot help but seriously envision the work-force in America to be the same if the mentality of the Tea-party and extremist republicans
materialized one day...
This type of work-environment sounds like a dream come true for extremist Tea-party and Republicans from their actions and words of recent... A
slave/master ONLY type of work-force!!!
Hardly.
Such mundane tasks are almost always more effectively accomplished by machines of some type. Many of the Asian cultures/communities -refuse- to allow
automation into their production lines because they want to put their people to work.
The issue, here, isn't even with FoxConn's policies - they are helpless in this regard, as it is highly likely the Chinese government will not allow
them to install automation in those facilities (because doing so would cut into the number of jobs that business could provide).
Why you think the Tea Party is for this is beyond me. Perhaps you have bumped your head a few too many times.
An efficient business is one that has the correct tools available to its employees to do their job safely, accurately, and timely (in that order of
importance - additional lines/stations are almost always more effective in the long run than rushed work that results in errors that jeopardize
contracts and can result in breach-of-contract fines). Employees should be fulfilled in their work and given opportunities to expand and/or advance
their skills and position (you may not always be able to offer an employee a promotion, but you can offer them cross-training that can improve their
skill sets).
Now - not all businesses have to work that way. Ultimately - he who owns the business and signs the pay checks decides how he/she is going to treat
his/her employees. Said employees are more than free to take their skills elsewhere - to another business or to practice on their own.
You're using a sort of inverse-slavery concept, here. You use the idea that people are enslaved in business to justify an attempt to control that
business... rather than make efforts to improve the freedom and options the individual has. Reading between the lines, you are saying: "we have to
work at these places, so we should be allowed to control them." Which is a self-slaving attitude.
And that is the conspiracy that people miss.
It's the conspiracy to hide the fact that you are allowed to take your skills and do something with them that enables you to make a living. It's
the conspiracy to make you dependent upon someone else for your living. It's the conspiracy to make you lose in either case; you subject to
government control/intrusion or debt-induced employee servitude.
So you have to take the unlisted third option - which is to slap both of them back into their respective places.
Unfortunately - we all get caught up in attempting to decide, for others, what should and should not be done to actually live as free citizens.
We've become a nation of self-centered dictators who feel our vote should be the final say in how other people a thousand miles away in a different
climate should live, work, and behave.
Anyway. If you're buying an i-whatever, you are not doing your "rich and greedy" arguments much good. i-anythings are highly overpriced and
underpowered for what you get. Of course - it's designed so toddlers can't even # it up - so the chances you'll do something Apple thinks -may- be
beyond your skill level are about zero. So, you'll spend less time talking to people who have to try and go back and figure out how to un-# your
computer (God Forbid people learn how to use a computer, or at least stop to read what damned buttons and boxes they are clicking on).
I suppose IT is a very good analogue for the human race. People idolize systems that give them almost no freedom and cost far more than they are
worth; while getting angry at self-induced problems encountered in systems that give more freedom but require more awareness and functional thought to
operate. In either case, upon encountering a problem with either system; people treat those who try and fix the problem like a piece of property
responsible for causing the problem (that was, 90% of the time, self-induced) and act like they are too good to pay that person for fixing the
computer they were too stupid to operate correctly.
Not all tech experiences are bad - often, for friends, they are much more humble and do not insist they are right.
(I will never forget a day someone was bragging to me about how stable an operating system was and how it didn't get viruses.
The next day,
his first words to me are.. "so, I hear you are pretty good with computers..." - the whole class immediately erupted in laughter at the irony.)