11 1 11, Two earthquakes hit China 1.11 2011

Originally posted by JupiterReed
THIS AS WELL AS THE ADEN QUAKE WERE PREDICTED A WEEK AGO!!!

THE QUAKE IN CHINA WAS PREDICTED LAST NIGHT BY TOLEC!!!

THIS MAN IS NOT LYING!!!

FINALLY YOU WILL HAVE PROOF!!!


youtu.be...

youtu.be...

Hmmmm
Very strange.

I have no comment now but thanks for the links. I will review the information you present with an open mind.
I appreciate your enthusiasm.

Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
reply to post by JupiterReed

 

Reptillian sea bases?? Thats crazy talk

I agree, shouldn't it be amphibious sea bases instead?

Maybe someone should look up 01/01/01, 02/02/02, 03/03/03, and so on. Then there is 01/02/03, 02/03/04, and so on. What about 11/10/09,10/09/08, and so on. I guess 01/03/05, 02/04/06, and who has the time?

no no no. earthquakes are nortourious for numberology and abide by it religiously,
obviously it was cause its 1111 or even 11111 if you wish.
otherwise they never happen.
science fact.
or not.

Originally posted by Curious and Concerned

Originally posted by pointr97
Your right, there is no history of quakes in that region of the planet.....

I believe muse7 was being sarcastic. And a quick search would confirm that the area is indeed prone to earthquakes. The Sichuan province (where one of the quakes struck) even has an earthquake museum to commemorate the tens of thousands who lost their lives in an earthquake there in 2008. I don't know how you came to the conclusion that there is no history of quakes?

Originally posted by pointr97
HOWEVER, go to the usgs site and take a look at the earthquake history. You will notice that there is more earthquake activity in the last week in the US than in the entire asia/russia region.

That is not unusual, due to the way the USGS database stores quakes. This information can be found on the USGS statistics page.

Starting in January 2009, the USGS National Earthquake Information Center no longer locates earthquakes smaller than magnitude 4.5 outside the United States, unless we receive specific information that the earthquake was felt or caused damage.

As quakes smaller than 4.5 outside of the US won't be stored on the USGS database, you would expect there to be more quakes recorded in the US compared to other regions, even if they are equally prone to earthquakes.

You go on to claim that there are no faults in the area, yet if you look at this map you can see that Western China is indeed prone to earthquakes. I agree that the planet is not "sitting on a happy pedestal", which is why I'm not sure what your point is in this thread? What does the numerology of the date have to do with it?

It is great to be aware of what is going on around you. But making false claims to fit your own theories is not trying to figure out what is happening in the world. It would pay to research your claims before claiming others have their heads stuck in a hole and are ignoring evidence, as the evidence does not support your claims.

you said it.

The guy in the video claims there will be an attack on a base off the coast of China. Did you bother to look at where these quakes were? If you weren't aware, China is a pretty big country, and these quakes occured in the Western region of China, far inland from the coast in the East. These quakes were thousands of kilometres away from the coast, let alone a (reptilian ) base off the coast. I would hardly call that a succesful prediction. Or is there something I am missing here?

Above Qoute from same poster (Curious and Concerned) as the first post I qouted in response to JupiterRed.
I can't help but get excited when I see someone post correct and researched information instead of coming to conclusions based on weak data.

There has been a third earthquake in the area, 5.5, 10 miles deep. My previous post had nothing to do with any date in specific. It is more based on the frequency and location of quakes in the recent past. To the guy that said I should ignore it because science has got it figured out....Huah, your absolutely right, we know everything there is to know about earthquakes and can predict them in advance to save countless lives. So no one else needs to even bother looking at the science. Well, my background is in environmental engineering, so do you mind if I keep looking? Earthquakes occur on or around fault zones or where the density of the sub layers drastically change an send the energy to the surface(like waves in an ocean). The occurrence of an earthquake in an area that doesn't have a fault anywhere near it, doesn't raise an eyebrow? The pattern aspect I mentioned was based on the strange earthquakes we have had in the US, locations that are receiving repeated quakes with no real good justification as to why. That was my point, and the only point to be made. There is some strange stuff going on with the earth, and we might want to start paying attention to it.

Just to satisfy my curiousity, is there anything else that is supposed to happen today being 11/1/11??? Here we go once again on the number thing... Can we possibly come up with something else than numbers.... Interesting thread though, I must say!!!

Originally posted by pointr97
There has been a third earthquake in the area, 5.5, 10 miles deep.

According to USGS, that was the initial quake in the Sichuan province. There has since been a 5.1 around the same depth and area, which I assume will be considered an aftershock. It's interesting to note that USGS has the Xinjiang quake as a 5.4, but some news sites are reporting 6.0?

Originally posted by pointr97
Well, my background is in environmental engineering, so do you mind if I keep looking? Earthquakes occur on or around fault zones or where the density of the sub layers drastically change an send the energy to the surface(like waves in an ocean). The occurrence of an earthquake in an area that doesn't have a fault anywhere near it, doesn't raise an eyebrow?

I have a background in engineering (mechanical) also. I agree that you should keep looking at what's going on, as science on earthquakes is far from perfect. But I think you actually need to keep looking further before making some of the claims you have made. As I previously stated, the Sichuan province has been prone to earthquakes in the past. This map of tectonic plates and faults in Asia Pacific shows that there are indeed fault lines around the Sichuan province. It's hard to tell exactly where the quakes were, but the 5.4 in the Northwestern Xinjiang region also appears to be near fault lines on that map.

Seismicity maps show that there have been many, many quakes in Western China since 1990. If multiple strong quakes struck central Russia I would consider it strange. But from what I can tell, there is nothing overly strange about the recent quakes in China. Its great to see that no casualties have been reported either.

reply to post by ImmortalThought

Originally posted by ImmortalThought
Above Qoute from same poster (Curious and Concerned) as the first post I qouted in response to JupiterRed.
I can't help but get excited when I see someone post correct and researched information instead of coming to conclusions based on weak data.

Thanks mate, I try to do what I can. At the moment I've got far more important things I should be doing, but I can't just sit back and watch false or erroneous claims be presented as fact without rebuttal. I'm not trying to attack anyone, but I hope I can stimulate further research and discussion without jumping to conclusions. Cheers

This is nothing crazy about the date. It would be interesting if 11 earthquakes hit on 11/11/11 at 11:11 am for a duration of 11 seconds all magnitude 1.1...