The Great Grandmother of All Conspiracies

www.whatdoesitmean.com...
“Last Days” Warned Here After England Gives “Gods Throne” To Catholics

"England “surrendered” this past week the “Throne of God” to the Roman Catholic Church from which it had “liberated” it from in 1558.

According to this treatise, a “satanic bargain” agreed to between Queen Elizabeth II and Pope Benedict XVI [both pictured top photo left], was approved by the British Queens Commonwealth this past week, allowing for the first time since the reign of Elizabeth I (1533-1603) [depicted 2nd photo left] for a Catholic spouse of a monarch to once again ascend to the British throne for the first time in 453 years since the passing in 1558 of the Act of Supremacy that outlawed this “abomination.”

Though British Prime Minister David Cameron stated upon the overturning of this centuries old ban that “Let me be clear, the monarch must be in communion with the Church of England because he or she is the head of that Church,” and the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, said the elimination of the “unjust discrimination” against Catholics would be widely welcomed, Patriarch Kirill warns in his treatise that the “deliberate” forgetting of the past in regards to this shocking move would insure an “apocalyptic” end to everything on this Earth"

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go and read the entire article and tell me what YOU think. I personaly have done some research into the topic, and have tried to understand the history of the Church as well as ancient cultures. I'm not going to provide any speculation, for I don't feel I have a good enough understanding to even be remotely accurate.

I will say this though, I have always held the assumption that the prophecy that are found in the texts have been deliberately carried out through government for a long long time. By who? Why? Well....read the article and come to your own conclusion.

I think you are talking a load of bollocks

The article is from Soorcha Faal. As you are new, I'll link you a well written expose of this charlatan...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Moving this thread where it belongs.

It's a Sorcha Faal article. This means it is invented idiocy. Do yourself a favour and google "who is sorcha faal?".

Go ahead. Do it. See if you can keep your mind from melting after playing around with that for a bit. And while you are at it look at all the utter bulldangle that has spewed forth from the pen of sorcha faal over the years. None of it ever had a shred of commonality with the world the rest of us inhabits. Sorcha Faal = SUCH A FAIL

If you're under the assumption that the Catholic Church has little power, you are quite mistaken...

www.cephas-library.com...
"Thus, for instance, after the First World War, when it seemed as if Bolshevism would conquer Europe, political movements in various countries with the intention of

Page 19
checking it. These found an immediate and ready ally in the Catholic Church, whose fulminations against the Socialist doctrines were becoming more and more virulent with the increase of the danger. Some of these movements were known by the names of Fascism, Nazism, Falangism, and so on. The Pope made these alliances effective by employing the influence of the Catholic Church as a religious institution, and of the Vatican as a diplomatic-political centre."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever wonder why just about every head of state or leader of a country has always made it an important issue to meet with the Pope?

I'm not saying the inforamtion presented in the article are the truth, that's why I asked for opinions. Real opinions, not just one liners....


BEFORE YOU REPLY, make every post matter.
No 1-Liners: Please do not create minimal "me too," "I agree," or similar very-short replies. (Adding "second line" to short comments doesn't count.)

reply to post by Zingdad


No doubt, I 100% agree that Sorcha Faal isn't the most of credible of sources... I've read sooooooooo many mistruths, disinformation, and pure non-sense in regards to the reports on the site. I have even said something to this effect in my profile. It's more of a reference site to start a conversation, or inspire more research for me.
Don't think for one second that the voice of www.whatdoesitmean.com is that of which I share.

reply to post by GAOTU789


The article referenced may be Sorcha Faal, but the content is to be found on the BBC web site and in essence is as stated.

Obviously i do not hold with the Sorcha Faal twist on it, but the subject is not a hoax.

The battle between the Christian Church of Rome and the Christian Church in Britain has been rattling on for over 1600 years and is not going to stop any time soon nor will it make any difference if Rome holds sway over the British throne.

Although there are a lot of real conspiracies that surround the battle between the two churches I honestly don't feel it makes any difference even if the Roman Church hold sway over the British throne.. they have done so before so it shouldn't kick off any prediction if they do so again.

Interesting bit of speculation tho

Absolute rubbish, Roman Catholic is a distinct and IMO ridiculous contradictory term since Catholic means universal and derived from Greek, and serves only to distinguish the Roman Catholic church from other forms of Catholism which would include todays Anglican church. The Greeks themselves have the Orthodox Catholic Church which is not exactly universal either, it's all cherrypicking. Now, for the first time since the dark ages, Britain can be seen to be leading the way to as near as democracy/or a democracy as is achievable. There is however no still no allowance for a British 'Roman Catholic' premier that is still in situ and is still unique against all other religions, and still only by convention, it is not written into a constitution because there is no written constitution, and even this new government declaration is by agreement/convention.

reply to post by PuterMan


I personally feel it is a joke that this Thread was moved to the Hoax section, but it's whatever. I'm not going to sit here and defend my stance, for I have no control over it either way....

For someone to sit there and try and point out that there is controversy as to who Sorcha Faal really is, truly is wasting their time. Its been in my profile since day one....
"My Favorite Sites:
www.whatdoesitmean.com...
Not because the information is factual, nor do I necessarily support the initiatives of Sochra Faal, rather I use it as a reference tool to open my eyes to possibilities and correlations that I had previously not been aware of."

What point of that is not understood? I thought it was pretty straight forward....

reply to post by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS

What point of that is not understood? I thought it was pretty straight forward....

Was that directed at me or was that just a wistful comment cast to the wind?

I understood what you said and I also don't think that the SUBJECT matter should be put in hoax just because of the treatment it was given on that particular site.

The subject is valid.

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by GAOTU789

 

The article referenced may be Sorcha Faal, but the content is to be found on the BBC web site and in essence is as stated.

Obviously i do not hold with the Sorcha Faal twist on it, but the subject is not a hoax.

edit on 29/10/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)

I only referenced you, becaue you had said that the subject is not a hoax. And I agree with you. This thread was moved to the Hoax section by a mod or whatever....

And the comment about my position on whatdoesitmean.com was not aimed at you, but the person who referenced whatdoesitmean.com as being not worthy of checking out.
that person being, Zingdad

reply to post by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS


I also don't think the fullness of it is a hoax given that this battle between the churches and control of the British Isles has gone on for what is 1600+ years. I suspect there is a lot more to it.. but honestly given how murky they have made the waters I've never come up with anything substantial... tho merging with your title the last time the inhabitants of these isles worked together against the will of Rome it was called (by those in Rome) the Great Conspiracy