Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
Such major formatting of a human being should only undertaken once we actually fully understand the complexities of the human brain.
To make many of these people non-violent, you'd have to redo them down to the primitive brain and cut off subconscious associations and ingrained
reflexes.
It seems to me that the amount of neural rewiring this would take could seriously damage a person's brain.
As for fully understanding the complexities of the human brain, if I may assume, (!?!) that means a perfect (give or take) linear understanding of
human thought, and tying that in a cause and effect manner. Today at least, I don't think we can do this. Perhaps thats a good thing. Put it this
way (and I almost got in to a fist fight with one of my engineer friends on this subject) The human brain was not designed by engineers. Thank God.
Being biological, it takes advantage of the innate need in biology to manipulate information, and do so with almost no loss of energy. In digital
informatics, you loose a piece of the signal you can loose the whole god damn message. Yet in bio-informatics if even a tiny fragment of the signal
survives, you can reconstruct its "meaning" A bit like a hologram, as one part is nothing and yet everything hence any "point" with in that 3D
matrix can represent the whole. Though perhaps at a lower level of resolution, a little less sharp? More on this later.
Look at where we are today, for example in psychobiology. We really have no idea "how" most psychotropic medications work. Oh sure in some cases we
see some cause and effect, for example in SSRI antidepressants, we see a raise in blood and cerebral seratonin levels. But why does that make some
people feel "better"? Perhaps because high seratonin levels are also associated with post satiation events, after we eat, or after sex. Take the
drug Lithium used for bi-polar illness. This drug was discovered by the Romans when after drinking from certain mineral springs, some people "felt
better, got normal, calmed downed" whatever. Today Lithium is one of the most widely prescribed psychotropic drugs, and of all of them unlike the
SSRI, we have NO IDEA why it works at all, it just does. And being it's toxic to the body only in high doses, it works, it's cheap, and has helped
to ease the suffering of many people, I say great! Now, it is in my nature to ask why something does what it does. I agree that any attempt to impose
some kind of technological "quickie" to a serious problem like this, given our current primitive abilities, (ever hear of MK-ULTRA?) you are likely
to end up with a lot of burned out minds, tortured bodies, and broken spirits.
As for redacting that part of the brain you call "primitive", it's there for a good reason. Hey, all that we are even that we don't understand is
part of what it is to be human. For me, that's the part of my brain that gets me out of bed in the morning. Nature works well. Who am I to argue?
But we do indeed have to deal with those among us I call "problem children" So... Everything that happens in biology is because information
organizes itself to optimize it's position at homeostasis plus .01 It seeks "no advantage", per say and given no challenge, won't change. It seems
biology seeks an advantage only if forced to. And every day, it's forced to. So oven time it becomes more aware and more robust. So, perhaps, one
approach would be to create a mechanism to supper-impose certain conditions on those individuals who are are a threat. They would adapt to it and it
could be "steered" in a way so that at the very least whatever their response, they would do no damage.
Since I can't design a "pill", etc that will redirected someone when they are hell bent on being a prick, perhaps I don't need to. I know nature
is the master in self organizing systems, wastes nothing. It may be to our advantage to further study the pattern of not just how but why information
is transferred between one and many biological systems. Perhaps it will help us design better mechanisms and protocols in the future. I will leave you
with this thought. Ever been in a large (or small) sport's stadium when the crowd did "The Wave"? One person started it, and even if the "wave"
petered out in the end, if only one person saw it at the end, the message was delivered, in it's entirety, the signal strength meant nothing. Thats
why biologists and "engineers" can almost come to blows.
Thanks for your thoughts, more soon.