It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama thinking about vaccinating kids against anthrax... Will anthrax be the next false-flag?

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   
Like last time it's gonna come from US biolabs... if there's actually another ``anthrax attack``...

Source

Maryland-based biotechnology firm Emergent BioSolutions on Monday said it had received a $1.25 billion contract to provide the U.S. government with 44.75 million doses of an anthrax vaccine.


Possible study of anthrax vaccine’s effectiveness in children stirs debate

The Obama administration is wrestling with the thorny question of whether scientists should inject healthy children with the anthrax vaccine to see whether the shots would safely protect them against a bioterrorism attack.

A key working group of federal advisers in September endorsed testing, sparking objections from those who consider that step unethical, unnecessary and dangerous.

The vaccine has been tested extensively in adults and has been administered to more than 2.6 million people in the military. But the shots have never been tested on or given to children, leaving it uncertain how well the vaccine works in younger people and at what dose, and whether it is safe. Unlike with measles, mumps and other diseases, the chance that children will be exposed to anthrax is theoretical, making the risk-benefit calculus of testing a vaccine on them much more questionable.


It's soooooooooo safe...
ANTI-SQUALENE ANTIBODIES LINK
GULF WAR SYNDROME TO ANTHRAX VACCINE


Data published in the February 2000 and August 2002 issues of Experimental and Molecular Pathology strongly suggests that Gulf War Syndrome is caused by a vaccine contaminated with squalene.

The August 2002 article is entitled "Antibodies to Squalene in Recipients of Anthrax Vaccine" (Exp. Mol. Pathol. 73,19-27 (2002)).

Squalene was found by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in five lots of the AVIP anthrax vaccine. The discovery of serum anti-squalene antibodies and the development of a test to detect these antibodies has made it possible to see that links appear to exist between the contaminated AVIP vaccine lots, the illness experienced by post-1997 vaccine recipients, the illness experienced by non-deployed 1990-1991-era patients, and the illness in deployed 1990-1991-era patients that has been referred to as GWS.

The data establishing these links is presented in the peer-reviewed February 2000 and August 2002 articles. The published findings (1) strongly suggest that the GWS-like illness being reported by all of the various patient groups is the same illness, (2) strongly suggest that the contaminated vaccine caused the illness in the AVIP group, and (3) further suggest that squalene contamination of one or more 1990-1991-era vaccines accounts for the GWS cases from that era.


FDA Tests Find Squalene in Anthrax Vaccine

Government Admits Banned Substance Exists in Vaccines, but Maintains It Does No Harm

By Michael Devitt
After years of repeated obfuscation, the federal government finally admitted that a banned chemical additive linked to the Gulf War syndrome has been found in some of the vaccines developed to protect military personnel from biological attack.


To remind everyone, Syria, Iran and Pakistan don't have weaponized anthrax. So if they pull a ``Iran did it``, they are lying through their teeth.
edit on 25-10-2011 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
If the CDC, Obama, FDA and whatever else alphabet agency does not have any problems running this experiment on their own kids first, I will consider reconsidering my views.



posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 03:08 PM
link   
There should be a clause.....for those who sign this bill will have their children volunteered for initial testing. If refused, then the bill doesn't pass. If you're not willing to test it on your own WHO THE F...GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO TEST IT ON ANYONE ELSE.



posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 10:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Vardoger
 


Yeah, I like that idea...

But still why would you want to infect kids with anthrax to prevent them from catching it, especially when anthrax is not a major issue, well at least here in Australia anyway. A friend of my dads caught anthrax by simply being out in a paddock one day. Did he die? no. There are other ways to deal with this stuff.

I feel ashamed to have made my kids have any immunisations after all the stuff I have read here at ATS and on other websites... No more I say, they didnt even get the H1N1 shot when they were promoting it a few years back, and look now, where has it gone?



posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 11:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Redevilfan09
reply to post by Vardoger
 

But still why would you want to infect kids with anthrax to prevent them from catching it, especially when anthrax is not a major issue, well at least here in Australia anyway.

No one is proposing that kids be infected with anthrax. The proposal is that we test the vaccine on kids, so we actually know whether or not to use it en masse if there's ever an outbreak that threatens kids. The vaccine is sterile and contains no anthrax cells, it doesn't infect anybody with anything.
www.fda.gov...


I feel ashamed to have made my kids have any immunisations after all the stuff I have read here at ATS and on other websites... No more I say, they didnt even get the H1N1 shot when they were promoting it a few years back, and look now, where has it gone?

If you mean where's the virus, we've had a few cases this month. But after a few years of vaccinating for it, it may be running of steam. Hard to tell, since most infections aren't subtyped. If you're asking where the shot itself has gone, it's been incorporated into the seasonal trivalent vaccine. The 2010 and 2011 seasonal flu shots both include antigens for the strain that was in the separate, monovalent shot in 2009.



posted on Oct, 26 2011 @ 02:09 AM
link   
The government bans drugs because someone might overdose or get hurt.
The government wants to ban guns because someone might go on a shooting spree.
The government wants to inoculate children with a vaccine that they have no idea what effect will have on children...and it's OK?

I really fail to understand this logic. Adults can't make a choice about what they put into their bodies, and adults are severely curtailed from coming to the defense of others, or defending themselves. But if children are negatively affected by this vaccine, it's all for the "common good".

/TOA



posted on Oct, 26 2011 @ 02:19 AM
link   
Nobody believed the original false flag in 2001..... So time to come up with another reason for the drug companies to pad their wallets.



posted on Oct, 26 2011 @ 02:22 AM
link   
Stop vaccinating kids!

Stop drugging kids!

Let kids have a free life - they are entitled to it.

And can we even contemplate all the kids on the wrong drugs, which are ruining their lives?



posted on Oct, 26 2011 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 

Let his kids go first. No way i would let my kids.



posted on Oct, 26 2011 @ 02:58 AM
link   
reply to post by TheMindWar
 


Yes,

Let his whole family go first, including him.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join