posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 03:03 PM
I was most impressed that he was not immediately shut down by the people there who disagree with his position.
Common respect for dissenting opinions is rare in public media. Very rare.
As to his observation that our leader's perspectives are the determinant of whether a government or leader in the third world is 'malleable' depending
on what desire he serves for the major powers is, however, moot.
We no longer live in a world that is ruled by the desire to improve the human condition. It is now ruled by the desire to control the human
condition. Therefore, such declarations of the worthiness and "morality" of our prospective allies and enemies is based upon a judgement which begins
and ends with the secret knowledge of the gatekeepers and agenda makers. So much so, that we as people rarely get to know what the facts are... let
alone the truth.
When a population is kept in ignorance, their judgement can be discarded as irrelevant by those who by virtue of their 'place' in the circles of
power; can begin to make real the fantasy that they are somehow magically better-equipped to make decisions and pass judgement on behalf of the people
they pretend to serve. The net effect is to legitimize their belief that they are 'better people' and 'deserve' or are 'entitled' to act in secret,
and lie with impunity.... because it is no longer a matter of morality or justice... but instead it is of political expedience.
edit on
25-10-2011 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)