posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 03:37 AM
I am hoping I can bump this up for some answers here, I am very confused.
There was a new thread started on this. It was proclaimed already debunked, and quickly locked.
I was interested in the debunking process and how it worked (I would like to learn more on how to debunk and how to get the information and evidence
to do so- because it helps me be able to research and debunk things myself if I get the feeling something isn't right). So I went through the earlier
threads on this to find that debunk moment..... and found- NOTHING.
Nothing but "It looks fake to me"," it looks like CGI"," the position doesn't look natural", "the kids don't pay much attention to it",
"that source is unreliable", etc. Not one shred of debunking evidence!
Not one admittance by the maker of hoax, no undisputable evidence of tampering with the film, nothign but personal opinion!
Or did I miss it? If so, then maybe someone can point me to it to read?
Don't get me wrong, I don't have any belief in this being real, but if a scientist were to say that he has determined a truth, he'd have to back
that up with something OTHER than their personal opinions!
I don't get how something can be labeled "debunked" (and all further discussion on it blocked) if no debunking has happened yet! "Because I think
it doesn't seem so" is not any evidence worth a damn that I could use if I ever wished to debunk something! ..... or is it here??