It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ryanssuperman
Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
I can kinda see both sides of the argument.
OBL can' be shown because h was a martyr and it would inspire others to blow up stuff and become martyrs. The problem with this is they KNOW he's dead, but without proof he's Schrodinger's terrorist. He is dead because they told us and he isn't dead because we have no proof. Why would we doubt the story? Well we know the government lies to us CONSTANTLY and how many times have we heard OBL died before the actual big caffufle that he did actually die?? If you look it up he's died multiple times. I wouldn't be surprised if he made a new video and was like look it was a double LULZ I WINZ!!
The martyr explanation is such BS. Al'qCIAda confirmed he was dead and announced the new leader. Not showing photos isn't going to avoid him becoming a martyr. They didn't kill him that day. Thats the easiest and best explanation to the series of events that took place before and after.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
We didn't release any video or pictures when Gaddafi died. We didn't take any, nor were we even there.
Originally posted by mike dangerously
Can't film someone who has died already and yet we paraded the bodies of Sadam's son's.I think the reason the vids of Husein's and Gaddafi's deaths were shown was to send a message to any one in that region who is thinking of not playing ball with the Oligarchs.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Well then why weren't more videos of Osama's destruction released? I am sure other people in the area would have had cameras. When a real story breaks these days, there are multiple videos and images to either confirm or deny the things that happened.