Does Ron Paul agree with 9/11 truth ?

Does Ron Paul agree with 9/11 truth ?

Ron Paul on 9/11 Inside Job

www.youtube.com...

I have thought about this before its funny someone posted this. I think that ron paul does not believe with the official story but he cant talk out cause it would ruin him. I have heard paul state before that theres a reason why we are attacked its because we try and police the world. I also agree that ron shouldn't associate him self with alex jones.

thanks for the video haven't seen it yet.

reply to post by dankety


Exactly. It's hard enough to convince people the Federal Reserve is destroying our lives.

If you then add "Oh yeah, and our government killed it own people on 9/11" against the unawakened masses, you have no shot at all. People can barely handle the truth about the banks.

If Ron Paul was in some way opposed to 9/11 truth, why would Alex Jones have him on his show? Just watch the clip of Alex Jones blowing up against Debra Medina when she turned her back on 9/11 truth.

Ron Paul has countless times said the government was responsible for 9/11 happening because they took away pilot's rights to have guns on the airplanes and told pilots to stand down when being hijacked.

I disagree with the notion that Ron Paul is somehow holding back. When asked about this he has said that he has too much on his plate (with the federal reserve) to go after the 9/11 issue, however by going after the federal reserve he can take away the unlimited money which allows for black ops. He also publicly said he supports a new investigation because 'most of the time the government lies' and he even mentions how most people thought JFK was a conspiracy when it first happened.

So this notion that Ron Paul is somehow opposed to 9/11 truth is a fallacy.

This thread is basically the same as this thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Did you really need two threads for this one question?

Sorry for making two threads.

Ron Paul wants to switch the economy to gold, therefore limiting economic growth to how much gold is avaiable. How is that good? If the only currency would have been gold there would have been no way in hell america would have been ablet to raise an army able to take on japan and the axis.

Ron Paul is completely aware of the nature of the hoax that was 9/11!
He knows the rolls that video and victim fakery played.
Whether he doesn't speak out because he is keenly aware of the dangers involved in doing so, or
whether he himself is just another (advanced) puppet of the real perpetrators is another question.

Here is a telling article from the dailypaul Dec. 2010.
www.dailypaul.com...

One question which naturally emerges from the study of the 9/11 memorials is : “Even if many ‘victims’ identities appear to be entirely made up by a computer database, could it still mean that a number of real people were killed on 9/11?"

Or did 9/11 claim no victims at all?

If we are to apply a logical thought-process to this particular issue, we need to look at questions of strategy and opportunity which the perpetrators must have prefigured. Surely, any sensible investigation must start by defining the type of crime that is being investigated. By defining the scope and the objectives of the crime, we should be able to rule out what the perpetrators themselves would have ruled out, in terms of unnecessary risks and liabilites. Was 9/11 designed as a barbaric murdering spree or was it more of a gigantic bank robbery? Let us make an’ educated guess’ and say that the latter is the case.

Bank robberies are considered terrible failures by the robbers themselves in the event of any bystander, guard/police officer getting killed; the sole objective of a bank assault is that of stealing money – never that of commiting murder. The penal aggravations of manslaughter is most unwelcome to any professional gangster – a grave mistake to be carefully avoided.
To be sure, there was no ‘added-value’ for the 9/11 perpetrators to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals. As we have seen, a large amount of alleged “victims” appear to be mock-up identities. Of course, precisely how many remains to be verified. Yet, consider this: if 300 deposit-boxes are emptied by a gang of bank robbers and fingerprints are found in just thirty boxes, would they be suspected only for robbing those thirty? Or would a court of law assume that they also robbed the other 270?

The idea that nobody was killed on 9/11 is, usually and predictably, rejected offhand by many folks as ‘outrageous’ or ‘unbelievable’. Others will accept that some simulation took place - but that a number of real people must have died. So let us imagine an ’intermediate’ scenario of, say, 1000 people being killed that day. If this were true, an immediate problem emerges: what if those 1000 families, at some stage, discovered that the other 2000 families were untraceable/non-existent? It is quite unlikely that the 9/11 planners would have run the risk of such a dire, worst-case scenario: Imagine a horde of angry families filing an avalanche of executive court orders, all demanding access to public records and official verifications! Truly a recipe for disaster… Surely, the 9/11 plotters didn’t want any of that? Thus, we may reasonably assume that every precaution was taken to ensure that NO civilian lawsuits might ‘spoil the show’; in all logic, the assassination of any number of people on 9/11 was a definite no-no, a stupid and senseless aggravation to be avoided at all costs. The chief directive of the Grand 9/11 Deception plan may well have been: “Zero casualties”.

.....cont.

reply to post by pshea38


If Ron Paul had any sense, he'd tell those guys to take that crap off their website. But that's just my opinion.

Here's a question? Why does the 9/11 Truth community seem to have a crush on Ron Paul? Or is it the other way around; why do Ron Paul supporters tend to be 9/11 conspiracy theorists?

Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
reply to post by pshea38

 

If Ron Paul had any sense, he'd tell those guys to take that crap off their website. But that's just my opinion.

Here's a question? Why does the 9/11 Truth community seem to have a crush on Ron Paul? Or is it the other way around; why do Ron Paul supporters tend to be 9/11 conspiracy theorists?

Forget the evidence. It's crap because you say so. And you're a Dr.! You should know.
Ron Paul and 9/11 CTs express more truth than their counterparts, yet not the whole truth.
Meanwhile you side with Evil Bush, Imposter and Charlatan Obama and Murderous Clinton
(et al) in 'not tolerating 9/11 conspiracies'.
All Righty Then. Tha tha tha tha tha tha That's All Folks!

reply to post by DrEugeneFixer


maybe everybody but you is a truther by now. Ever thought of that?

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer

 

maybe everybody but you is a truther by now. Ever thought of that?

Just like that movie I am Legend. LOL You crack me up, Cassius.