It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just watched RT headlines at 10pm, totally destroyed US Gov credibility.

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   
What with Press TV going off the air in the UK I expect the same fate for RT. There is no way TPTB will allow this to continue. The RT article was about the links between the governments and corporations. How corporations are offering millions in lobbying to the political elite for billions in contracts.

I feel RTs days are numbered after which they will start on the internet access to those and other alternative media groups.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:33 PM
link   
RT has an agenda. As much as I like their coverage, agenda exists.

What makes you think all of this is not "controlled reaction?" Think of the Hegelian Dialectic.. this is the second step.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by frozenspark
 


I agree 100%. I like their info but they have an agenda. BTW who owns them. I have heard rumors but nothing concrete.

They may possible be working for the good power instead of the darkside. We will soon find out.

Peace to all



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by frozenspark
RT has an agenda. As much as I like their coverage, agenda exists.


I hate to admit it but I have to agree. They have decent funding, and the "truth" will NEVER have a corporate sponsor/funding.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Buford2
 





I agree 100%. I like their info but they have an agenda. BTW who owns them. I have heard rumors but nothing concrete.

Russian government owns and funds it. It is as concrete as it gets. And i am sure that strong unified US with no corruption is just what Russian government want. I mean, surely they will not try to destabilize US using anything - true or false. No way.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by frozenspark
 


Yes I often think about how TPTB like to play both sides of the fence, its the only way to ensure you are on the winning side, but this time the russians and chinese have thier own money, and dont need the rothchilds money anymore. but hang on a minute, tptb are calling RT the enemy, are the russians our enemy once again?

We can see a great deal if we just open our eyes. Countries are, and have been for a while, positioning themselves on the global stage. So are they going to orchestrate a "conventional", non nuclear war to depopulate and enforce their grip over the people?

We see the chinese, and russians bonding like children, and we also see the US and UK powers that be, throw their rattles our the pram like children and walk out in the UN. Afterall, "the world is a stage"
edit on 13-10-2011 by TheMindWar because: Typo



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   
OP: Why no link to the article you read on RT ?
Would be interesting to discuss it here.

Buford2: "Who owns RT ?" Good question! As far as I know it's a subbranch of RIA Novosti,(Russian International News Agency) which is state owned.

What I find interesting, in these days that you ll find more insight on several subjects (OWS for instance) than on american media. It's somehow bizarre when you think that you have to rely on Russian TV for checking whats going on in your own country.

On the other hand you'll not see many articles which are Anti-Putin on RT either.



BTW Editor in chief's name's Svetlana ;-)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by svetlana84
 


Sorry, just watched the headlines on TV, Russia Today. I suppose I should have said news clip to make it a little clearer. My appologies.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMindWar
 


Are we talking about this: Putting a price on US democracy ?


Or is censorship already that far, that we can not discuss it ?



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by svetlana84
reply to post by TheMindWar
 


Are we talking about this: Putting a price on US democracy ?


Or is censorship already that far, that we can not discuss it ?


Yeah, thats the clip, thanks for posting



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:47 PM
link   
reply to post by svetlana84
 


Haha, you have to laugh when you hear Obama say a lot of that stuff wasn't "necessarily" illegal.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMindWar
 


yes a very telling moment: it wasn't necessarrily illegal (pause, pause, how the heck will i get out of this ?) aehm but maybe immoral.

And this from a lawyer



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 05:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by svetlana84
reply to post by TheMindWar
 


Are we talking about this: Putting a price on US democracy ?


Or is censorship already that far, that we can not discuss it ?


i see nothing in this report that i would consider inaccurate.

the scoundrels in our corporate financial system will self destroy due to arogance.

what other countries do to survive economically will be interresting.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheMindWar
reply to post by frozenspark
 


Yes I often think about how TPTB like to play both sides of the fence, its the only way to ensure you are on the winning side, but this time the russians and chinese have thier own money, and dont need the rothchilds money anymore. but hang on a minute, tptb are calling RT the enemy, are the russians our enemy once again?


You are no more aware of what is going on than an NPC in a MMORPG. You might have something to say, and might even participate in a battle or two, but you were never playing the game. You never picked a side, and you never had any control. In fact, until you realize that a game is being played with your life, where both sides are designed, collapsed and imploded at will, you are not awake or even conscious.



We can see a great deal if we just open our eyes. Countries are, and have been for a while, positioning themselves on the global stage. So are they going to orchestrate a "conventional", non nuclear war to depopulate and enforce their grip over the people?


I assume you assume that both sides are funded by the same people, so I'll skip that part. It's not about profit, it's about control. The world has already been conquered, and there is occasional restructuring of the Earth Corp., but never real change. Once the fingers of the globalists were global, the chains went on and the debt slaves lost for eternity.

No country is going to war, governments are going to war because they are told to. Everyone wants to think that shady people control the government on this site, but never admit that it would entail war by decree from those same sources. It's a great way to spur the economy, and keep the debt running so that the slaves never really wake up. It's also a great population control and even a total waste of resources that would otherwise feed the hungry or build a school and things like that weaken the masters.


We see the chinese, and russians bonding like children, and we also see the US and UK powers that be, throw their rattles our the pram like children and walk out in the UN. Afterall, "the world is a stage"
edit on 13-10-2011 by TheMindWar because: Typo


I agree that China and Russia are banding together, but not out of desire from the people or even the governments. It is the real puppetmaster cartel that is positioning countries on the global stage of warfare, and as far as I'm concerned, we have been at war with those countries for the last six years at least. Cyberwarfare and other forms are going to redefine the word WAR.

The real question is, is it really a war when there's only one side?



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join