posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 04:06 AM
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Uranium requires enrichment to be used as fuel, Thorium does not. Uranium enrichment is a nasty process, as I'm sure you know, whereas Thorium can be
just extracted from ore in mineral form, turned into oxide and put to use....
...in a breeder reactor. edit: solid fuels make fission product extraction near impossible, which is why thermal spectrum breeder reactors should
employ liquid fuels,
energyfromthorium.com...
when the technology becomes mature, it'll be a piece of cake, but
today we have a hurdle to overcome, namely startup material. Th is fertile
only.
don't get me wrong, i'm all for developing thorium breeders, they are, radioactive fission products aside, all that fusion power ever claimed to be,
but you cannot rely on fuel cost to make the industry see the light, Uranium is available in such quantities that even enrichment requirements will
not deter LWR operators anytime soon. besides, certain designs are capable of operating on natural uranium (CANDU, RBMK, but the latter is the unsafe
Chernobyl type) with all the advantages this implies, even though they will never break even as breeder reactors.
That's why i claimed that Th232's nuclear properties are the key to its eventual adoption.
edit on 2011.10.12 by Long Lance because: (no reason given)