It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well said. I too find it a bit suspicious how vigorously the scientific community is trying to say the CME was just a "coincidence". I seriously do not think that is the case...the object was much larger than they are trying to claim.
Originally posted by 17sok
reply to post by king Pop!p
I don't understand... there is an article about it on the front page of the SOHO website about it (which is run by NASA and the ESA).
As far as I can see, the only thing that is not right is the official view that the CME that occured immediately after the impact was a co-incidence. Hopefully, these types of occurences will spur on some serious research to debunk the dirty snowball theory... and from this it will be proven that comets are solid, negatively charged masses that react with the protons in the solar wind and brighten (as well as the coma size increasing) as they get closer to the sun. The impact of a negatively charged mass into our positively charged sun could theoretically cause a magnetic disruption, and generate CMEs as shown on some recent STEREO footage
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 17sok
What happened here? What was this one? Special "comet" (there was no CME)?
This one?
edit on 10/5/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 17sok
The impact of a negatively charged mass into our positively charged sun could theoretically cause a magnetic disruption, and generate CMEs