It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now this is why I like a beer before replying. It gets me all talkative and waxing lyrical. Instead of waning cynical. Otherwise I more resemble the grumpy old buggers who usually/often/sometimes/maybe start the debunking threadsor debunking comments. Yes, grumpy people...anyway
"You are all wrong and this is why, you dumbasses!"
Oh dearie, dearie. You're objecting to a "general tone of condescension" from "some" of the posters? People who make that complaint have usually spent their time in the music and cooking forums, or they're brand new.
Will somebody please #ing spare me from the brutal arrogance and general tone of condescension from some of the thread posters and their "friends" around here?
Your position is that calling someone who is stupid, "stupid" violates the "no tackiness" term and condition? Shall I address them as what, "intellectually challenged?" "Daft?"
But here's my point, calling someone stupid for either being stupid, clueless, or having a different opinion to you is just tacky. So #ing stop it! (No profanity filter dodging here!)
You mean you are the only one who gets to call you names? What happens if someone else calls you a name? They blow up? You blow up? By the way, I'm glad you're so strongly opposed to ramming opinions down other's throats.
You are not me, you do not get to call me names no matter how veiled, and you certainly most never get to ram your opinions down my throat like those duck they overfeed corn with in order to fatten the liver for Pate de Fwa Gra..... So state yer case and remain polite and courteous instead of making yerself look like overbearing, intolerant dorks. Dorks eat with sporks, and in large, gentle groups with mild medical supervision. Eventually....