It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Onderdonk, 37, who teaches at California State University, Long Beach, is an expert when it comes to analyzing how landforms evolve through time and how faults change the landscape.
The professor received a $65,516 grant this year from the U.S. Geological Survey’s Earthquake Hazards Fund to continue his research and study the fault history of the San Jacinto Fault Zone, which he said is one of the state’s most seismically active areas and poses and threat to the Inland Empire.
“One of the main goals is to look for patterns — if there is a pattern, what is that pattern,” he explained. “So far, we’ve been able to document the timing of the last seven large earthquakes (larger than a 6.5 on the Richter scale), large enough to break the earth’s surface.
“The timing between these last seven earthquakes has always been between 160 and 200 years. And so on average, there should be one large earthquake every 180 years … We estimate the last major earthquake was around 1800, so that was about 200 years ago, and if this pattern is consistent then we should be expecting another large earthquake.”
“Most of this work can be used to estimate the amount of shaking that new buildings or bridges and power stations and things like that need to account for and what the probability of an earthquake is,” he said. “This keeps us aware of the possibilities, and reminds us that earthquakes are a natural, inevitable cycle.”
“People sometimes ask me if a large earthquake could cause part of California to break off and fall into the ocean,” he said. “It’s a myth — we are on a continent that is not floating, but solid rock all the way down. We could not be separated in one earthquake, although new waterways might be created.”
“Most people have driven along a fault and not realized it,” Onderdonk said. “It can take years to find just the right sediment and excavate trenches and have a cross-sectional view of a fault.”
This article is misleading. I never said we could "predict" earthquakes and this is not the focus of my research. The title and sentence that use this term should be changed. We are just trying to look for patterns in the timing of past earthquakes to estimate what time frame we should expect the next large earthquake if a pattern is persistent. -Nate Onderdonk
Originally posted by kdog1982
How hilarious!
Not you,OP,but the paper and the article.
If you look at the comments below the article ,the guy who the story is about makes a comment.
This article is misleading. I never said we could "predict" earthquakes and this is not the focus of my research. The title and sentence that use this term should be changed. We are just trying to look for patterns in the timing of past earthquakes to estimate what time frame we should expect the next large earthquake if a pattern is persistent. -Nate Onderdonk
www.gazettes.com...