It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by undo
Neither are a threat in my eyes.
At least when compared to fascism, which America is already getting a taste of. In fact, the day we hired those Nazi scientists was the day we set the wheels in motion for the destruction of this country.
Let's stop derailing this subject and look at the bigger picture. You can't have it all your way so there will either be people out there protesting or there will be no one protesting. Which do you prefer?
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by Maxmars
Perhaps it would be ore accurate to say that we failed to establish control of the governance that allowed this behavior to persist, rather than being assimilated into it.edit on 1-10-2011 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)
No, it wouldn't be. Because (never start a sentence with because unless you care not what grammar nazis think) the operative inference is that there was a choice on behalf of the public.
I hate to be that guy but when education is designed to either create rock stars or just convey enough for a machinist to perform his job, despite the capacity to think beyond just that, then there is a possibility that society has set itself up for failure.
Seriously, education is the biggest problem here and I know many people who can talk with the big boys and I know several big boys who don't have a clue what they be talking about..
Besides...where is failure even a relevant consideration when we see what 'everyday' people are doing with access to information and instant communication?
There are many assumptions we have had pre-internet because there was no communication and they should be squashed inside of a decade...I am not imploring, merely estimating...
Originally posted by playswithmachines
Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by michaelmcclen
It is an insult to treat people equally in my opinion when we are inherently unequal.
Evolution would say natural selection, let the intelligent move on and leave the weakest links to die. So do not bring evolution into the discussion here.
I agree and disagree with this post.(!)
Yes, lowering standards just to get the numbers up is bad, overtaxing the schools with useless subjects & too many students is bad. But that's all financial
The better option is to educate EVERYONE to as a high standard as possible, but sadly education is seen as a problem rather than as a solution.
The fact that we are inequal (unique) makes us what we are. If we can learn to co-operate each to his ability without any form of prejudice, we could finally progress into a 'type 1 civilisation'.
As for evolution, i think the fittest & strongest would survive, not necessarily the smartest
Originally posted by TheThirdAdam
reply to post by bjarneorn
Yes bush did that under the guise of protection from terrorism, but what these people want is government protection from social/economic injustice... it handing would be communist leaders another layup in the same game
11. They have used the military and police force to prevent freedom of the press.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by undo
Neither are a threat in my eyes.
At least when compared to fascism, which America is already getting a taste of. In fact, the day we hired those Nazi scientists was the day we set the wheels in motion for the destruction of this country.
Let's stop derailing this subject and look at the bigger picture. You can't have it all your way so there will either be people out there protesting or there will be no one protesting. Which do you prefer?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by Misoir
Right now they just seem like a joke to me, I would not even waste my time with these people. Yes these people should be punished for their crimes against humanity, violation of our natural rights, conspiracy to form a global governance, and treason against the Republic. But do we really need to drag in these cultural issues which will certainly alienate Conservatives such as me.
I bet they said the same things about the founding fathers!
Sure, some of their claims may be a bit off, but not completely wrong. That does not take away from the fact that it is a possibility.
They are voicing their opinion and that's all that matters. Who cares if it alienates people as long as they have that right to speak.edit on 29-9-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by openminded2011
I doubt the Liberals in Egypt liked the hardline muslims, yet they are the ones who have taken over from the Liberal protesters who started the movement. Funny how these revolutions can turn out.
Originally posted by AlreadyGone
reply to post by woodwardjnr
So who took the future away from my daughter...she is just graduating college next spring. Who made her go out and work....that was her idea...not mine, I wanted her to concentrate on school.
Most of the protestors I have seen are adults...young adults, but adults. Capable and able to work.
Who took the youth from my uncles in 1941-42-43?
Who took the youth from my mom's baby brother in 1967?
They all came back and led good lives...a few are still here living good lives.
What did I take from the protestors in NY City? An opportunity to read a book for free at the library...the opportunity to read another book after that. The opportunity to go to a community college or tech school and learn a skill that they could actually use in life?
What did I take from the protestors in NY City...the opportunity to go to night school and learn a new skill after they found the degree they had was useless...I did that at 38.
What meal am I not providing with my tax dollars for FoodStamps, WIC? How many mouths have I not tried to feed at food banks I have volunteered at, or meals i have delivered, or meals I have donated, or boxes of food freely given through my church to the needy...who did my greedy capitalist self deny?
What part of a contract did I make them skim over? What opportunity to move to where the jobs aredid I stand in the way of? My older kids have no problem working...one worked in Montana and one is in Vermont...they moved from NC...
Again...it takes effort on the part of the individual...as an American, you have the right to Life, Liberty, and the PURSUIT of Happiness...PURSUIT...effort of the individual to obtain the life they choose that makes them happy.
Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by Misoir
Right now they just seem like a joke to me, I would not even waste my time with these people. Yes these people should be punished for their crimes against humanity, violation of our natural rights, conspiracy to form a global governance, and treason against the Republic. But do we really need to drag in these cultural issues which will certainly alienate Conservatives such as me.
I bet they said the same things about the founding fathers!
Sure, some of their claims may be a bit off, but not completely wrong. That does not take away from the fact that it is a possibility.
They are voicing their opinion and that's all that matters. Who cares if it alienates people as long as they have that right to speak.edit on 29-9-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)
These people are NOT, NOT, NOT, the Founding Fathers. Period.
These people are Americans citizens from all walks of life... Many of them are the kids that
are going to have to pay for the government spending, the institutional greed and corruption
on Wall Street.
These people aren't protesting the loss of their natural rights.
So?
they are protesting the very validity of a system that sells fake capital at highly inflated premiums.
IT isn't 1776 anymore you know.
They are out there marching together as puppets of the socialist party USA, half of them can't even articulate why they are there.
Bull crap... They are there doing what Americans should have done years ago. Conservatives seemed
to be real mad about the results of this corruption, but now, because it is aimed at the real seat of power
they are fearful... typical.
It's just another hair-brained leftist protest aimed at demonizing everything that makes this country great. The generic moniker of the "evil corporation". I wonder if Facebook, Twitter, Verizon wireless, and other corporations that allow these people to spread their messages are evil too?
I see, so institutional corruption, criminal intent and systemic robber makes this country great, huh?
You are making this about other corporations, aren't you?
These people think anyone who make more than they do, or doesn't show up to burning man is evil. They are the useless handout crowd.
These people are NOT the Founders. They are not marching for individual rights, they are not marching for economic liberty. They are marching for collectivism.
Again they are not rich, white, male quasi aristocrats from 235 years ago... They are marching because they have to pay for the corruption just like you, you should be marching instead of watching Fox news. They are
marching because the banks declared economic war on America 3 years ago and these people
had to pay for it through taxes and they already pay for it at an institutional level. You expect people
to take what they are given, that is a slave's mentality.edit on 3-10-2011 by mastahunta because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
They are marching for collectivism and socialist control of the economy.
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by mastahunta
Yay! More liberal tripe.
Unlike you and these idiots on Wall St. I'm very careful who I stand next to.