It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by SplitInfinity
LUCA...was never the only one...but one of many. A single celled organizm can split by mytosis....but a complex...multi-cellular being cannot. Split Infinity
I do not understand what your saying here Split,
From everything I have read LUCA would of had to been a very complex creature for it to do as claimed.
It would of had to been, just as, if not more complex than the modern cell.
That's kinda like a dog chasing it's tail, yes?
Using evolution how could such a creature be that complex so early in the evolutionary process?
Not mocking, just want clarification.
Thanks,
Quad
edit on 8-1-2012 by Quadrivium because: changed "be" to "been"
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Can someone, anyone please tell me about one thing about evolution that has actually been witnessed, and has also been recreated in a lab.
www.astrobio.net...
The study lends support to a hypothesis that LUCA may have been more complex even than the simplest organisms alive today, said James Whitfield, a professor of entomology at Illinois and a co-author on the study.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Quadrivium
Another good analogy is the business world. Industries form to fill a niche. The small companies grow and spread. They begin to take over and dominate the competition and become multinationals. The only antidote to this eventual mono culture is catastrophe and collapse.
That to me is evolutions greatest message. That as we move towards no or little diversity we will be the ones that pay the price. Humans have the unique power to prevent this in both commerce and the natural world but will remain powerless unless we identify the question.
Evolution as far as I am concerned identifies and asks that question. Creation hides away from it with 'dont worry
more will be created.' As in business job creation does not work.
And what if anything, does this species have to do with humans, or any other life here on earth?
I suggest looking into the genus Drosophilia. There have been a number of speciation events that have occurred within this species.
I feel like I have had this convo before. When there are other strains that come out, the species is still the same. I can see how you might thing that its changing species, but its not. Even odder is that those changes might be permissable within that species all along. Just like humans can have blue eyes, or green eyes.
Take a look at any CDC....Center for Disease Control....web site or information on Evolving Viral and Bachteriological Strains. There are THOUSANDS IF NOT MILLIONS OF EXAMPLES!
And like I said, we have no way of knowing if those were changes that are normal within that species all along.
Evolution has been witnessed happening right in front of the eyes of Tens of Thousands of People looking at a strain under the Microscope.
This is what I have been trying to tell you or at least of an example of.....EVOLUTION IS UNDENIABLE....it is a FACT and we use this knowledge every day and to a greater and greater extent. Split Infinity
Originally posted by Quadrivium
I can understand the concept of what you are saying, but there is no evidence for this.
Yes mammals took over when dinosaurs became extinct, and yes the fossil records shows that some animals adapted to the point they became a different species but not that they morphed into an entirely new group of animals.
Yes new species can be found as one ascends the strata.
However, speciation within basic kinds is different from the introduction of new kinds, and evolution requires a dizzying array of basic new kinds. The origination of a new form has never been documented in the modern world of scientific observation, while perhaps several species every day go extinct. The opposite of evolution occurs today, and fossils show that the opposite of evolution also occurred in the past.
This is the same nonsensical stuff that countless others are saying and has been debunked several times. Nobody ever claimed that animals "morphed" into an entirely new group of animals. You are insinuating that it happens over night. It does not. Creatures SLOWLY change according to their environment. You admitted it is shown in the fossil record. There isn't a "new" form that suddenly emerges and it will NEVER be observed. We just use labels to explain where the species is, in its respective development and evolution. Extinction isn't the opposite of evolution, it's one of the main mechanisms. I wish half the people commenting on evolution would actually read a little bit about it before making such hasty generalizations about it.
There are just way to many things pointing in the same direction. Sorry.
That link is not proof of anything, and what you consider proof is not proof either. It's all just wishful thinking all the way around;Atheists,Muslims.Christians,Buddhists, Pagans... They all like to think they've got it figured out and that their "documentation" is the end all be all verdict on the matter. This simply isn't so. It's fine to believe whatever you like, it is not fine to assert that it is the truth. My opinion, of course.
Monkeys don't turn into humans, PERIOD.
Dogs don't turn into cats.
They also don't branch out and create sub species either.
There has never been any missing links found out of the over 5 million species we have on this planet.
There has never been any intermediate species found, out of the 5 million present. Possibly another wake up call. There have never been any fossils or bones tying any species to any other species, out of 2.5 million bones found, yet another wake up call.
I understand its not suppose to happen quickly enough for us to witness it, but without leaving any trace, and no trace of it happening any longer, really makes you wonder.
How can someone believe in something that has no proof behind it, and no hope of proof based on how long its been considered.
At least in religion there is documentation.
I believe we were placed on this planet by another race. There is good reason why its hard to produce little to no proof of this. Aside, the bible concurs.
With evolution there is no reason why we don't have proof. There are postulated theorys to cover why we don't have proof, but nothing to back those up.
In the recent pages I have yet to have anyone present me with any links that say they ARENT just a hypothetical theory.
The Bacterial Flagellum is Reducibly Complex
warforscience.wordpress.com...
Proves there is inteligence behind design.
Not proof of anything pfft. How in the world do you explain an organelle equiped with an electric motor, with stator, slip ring, arm, and the whole appearance of motors we have today.
That link is not proof of anything, and what you consider proof is not proof either. It's all just wishful thinking all the way around;Atheists,Muslims.Christians,Buddhists, Pagans... They all like to think they've got it figured out and that their "documentation" is the end all be all verdict on the matter. This simply isn't so. It's fine to believe whatever you like, it is not fine to assert that it is the truth. My opinion, of course.