It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
Thanks for proving my point That "truthers" dont care about objective evidence that conflicts with fantasies So just what is "useless" about it Is one of only 3 images taken of AA11 impact on North Tower
Unlike you, I do not have a pet fetish about what truthers or OS believers care or fantasize about. Best to leave those abnormal obsessions to others.
The evidence you have supplied is as objective as you are. It may be best not to utilize words which you obviously have issues with.
Please don't thank me; you deserve all the credit for this one.
I enjoy looking at cartoons, photoshopped images, crappy low-res video frames and fictional witness accounts just as much as the next person, but this fabricated garbage would not even cut it as evidence in a Kangaroo Court
Originally posted by CatJockey
To be fair, I am looking and have found about 20 eyewitness accounts ...
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Yahm16
Better yet, why did the ONLY camera take 1 picture every 5 seconds?
Becuase these images were recorded to tape, and they use the 1:5 ratio to save storage on the tape. Otherwise, they'd be going through five times the number of tapes. Realistically, most things that would be attacking the Pentagon wouldn't have been travelling 500 mph so the 1:5 ratio is fine for getting the details of people, vehicles, and the like.
...and no, I'm not making this up. We used to record everything to tape in our own building until we started recording electronically and we used the 1:5 ratio ourselves.
Originally posted by micpsi
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Yahm16
Better yet, why did the ONLY camera take 1 picture every 5 seconds?
Becuase these images were recorded to tape, and they use the 1:5 ratio to save storage on the tape. Otherwise, they'd be going through five times the number of tapes. Realistically, most things that would be attacking the Pentagon wouldn't have been travelling 500 mph so the 1:5 ratio is fine for getting the details of people, vehicles, and the like.
...and no, I'm not making this up. We used to record everything to tape in our own building until we started recording electronically and we used the 1:5 ratio ourselves.
and this link: 911review.com...
Any pilot will tell you that no commercial plane could travel at 500 mph close enough to the ground to hit light poles. That's a cruising speed attainable only at an altitude of about 35,000 ft. Jet engines don't operate at full capacity under conditions of such high air density near the ground.
And perhaps one day when you open your eyes you will recognize the fact that the image of the plane indicated in some of the five frames initially leaked from the US government is that of a plane much smaller than a Boeing 757.
Originally posted by Haxsaw
come on use your head before you type such rubbish, there are mutliple reasons why the pentagon should be under 24hr surveillance with high-tech equipment(as it no doubt was at the time).
Originally posted by micpsi
Any pilot will tell you that no commercial plane could travel at 500 mph close enough to the ground to hit light poles. That's a cruising speed attainable only at an altitude of about 35,000 ft. Jet engines don't operate at full capacity under conditions of such high air density near the ground.