It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Friedman argued that if one were to promote the natural dissolution of ethnic economic disparity, and allow the free market to dictate an employee’s worth, then the size of government and its ability to intercede “on the behalf of others” would naturally decrease because of the realization that it actually hurts those it is supposed to help. When that happens, the markets will be freer to operate and they will generate more prosperity for all workers.
This raises some interesting questions, but perhaps the most interesting one is posed by 24/7 Wall St. when they ask whether or not the population shifts have “any implications that state and federal governments should consider to better address economic and other concerns.”
This question is particularly interesting because, according to several welfare state studies, minority groups are at an unfortunate disadvantage in regards to economic and social measures like unemployment, education and median income.
This is not new; it has been the case for many years. However, what must be stressed is that this is not because of an inherent racism in America (as some would insist). On the contrary, several conservative economists, most notably Milton Friedman, posit that it is because of a misguided compassion (as opposed to racially-charged viciousness) in the form of government intervention that this economic disparity has been prolonged and exacerbated.
When one disrupts the natural state of the marketplace with things like minimum wage laws, no matter how good the intention, they disrupt the natural advancement of the worker (minority or not). (Ronald Reagan said it best when he quipped: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”)
The ethnic landscape of America’s cities has changed dramatically in the past decade. Populations of 22 of the 100 largest cities now have minority groups that together are in the majority. Of course, the question is not whether the change is bad — it is not. Instead, the question is whether it has any implications that state and federal governments should consider to better address economic and other concerns. Read more: The Eight Cities Where Minorities Are Now in the Majority - 24/7 Wall St. 247wallst.com...
The rapid immigration of white populations into the U.S. ended 90 years ago and has been replaced by an influx of Asian and Hispanic immigrants, many of whom now have been here for more than a generation. Similarly, a century ago the black population was concentrated primarily in the Deep South. Many blacks migrated north for industrial jobs in the 1920s and 1930s. Growth in the black population has added to the ethnic diversity of many large northern cities. Read more: The Eight Cities Where Minorities Are Now in the Majority - 24/7 Wall St. 247wallst.com...
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
I don't know why...but it creeps me out when people get freaked out over losing the majority based on their skin color.
Originally posted by ignant
Your statements start off really biased. America, as in the land, started off with Native Americans as its first settlers, not caucasians.
They were 95% Americans were killed off and a police state led by 'white' people formed some 235 yrs ago.
You refer to minorities, immigrants, then white people, as if they latter aren't immigrants too. Around 85% of Americans are still of Irish/German heritage.
I do think theres a serious problem with the 1million per year in illegal immigrants staying un USA, and that has piled up so far to around 30 million illegals in USA, of mostly central-south american (hispanic) descent.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
First of all...I think this is great news...it's good that the country is becoming more diverse.
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
First of all...I think this is great news...it's good that the country is becoming more diverse.
Please explain why this is great news. I bet people from the U.K. would probably argue it's not working out so well.
Why is it considered bad now to appreciate borders, language, and culture?
This whole globalist mentality is out of control, it's destroying America....
Originally posted by ignant
Your statements start off really biased. America, as in the land, started off with Native Americans as its first settlers, not caucasians.
They were 95% Americans were killed off and a police state led by 'white' people formed some 235 yrs ago.