It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IndieA
reply to post by Biigs
[more
If that's the actual figure, that brings us to $1,000 per citizen per month. WTF, right?edit on 3-9-2011 by IndieA because: (no reason given)
Notice those pallets are double stacked. ...and remember those are $100 bills.
Originally posted by Biigs
can you afford the other 600$ that the USA spends (which it has) either?
second
Originally posted by IndieA
Debt per Second
Ok so I saw that the US is borrowing at a rate of $58,000 per second and thought I would crunch some numbers to make better sense of that figure. Here we go.
$58,000 per second * 60 seconds = $3,480,000 per minute
I heard Sarah Palin give the figure of $3 million per minute today in a Tea Party speech.
So I thought $3 million per minute equals about 1 cent per citizen per minute.
$3,000,000 divided by 300,000,000 citizens = $0.01
$0.01 per minute * 60 minutes = $0.60 an hour
We are spending way too much and we should concentrate more on our citizens and reduce spending in several areas immediately. One of these areas...Foreign Aid. We give BILLIONS to other countries and if the shoe was on the other foot....I doubt they would do the same for us.
As far as the Deficit....one 8 year period of economic boom is enough to lift us out of our current problem. This must go hand in hand with budget cuts and tax reform. Split Infinity
$0.60 an hour * 24 hours = $14.40 a day
$14.40 * 30 days = $432 per month.
Well there you have it.
The US is borrowing at a rate of over $400 per month per citizen.
Where’s the outrage?
Having taken their blunt budget ax to Medicare, Medicaid, Head Start, EPA, NPR, and dozens of other popular and effective programs, they (Republican congressional leaders) then scampered to save one of the least popular and least effective federal programs on the books: the annual taxpayer subsidy for Big Oil.
As gasoline prices were rising to $4-a-gallon and higher, the House GOP voted unanimously to let the oil giants continue siphoning $4 billion a year out of our public treasury.
All 241 of the Republican/Tea Party House members—with not even one dissenter in the bunch—declared that in this time of a supposed budget “crisis,” the neediest among us are not the elderly and the poor, but the little waifs of Big Oil.
Meanwhile, ExxonMobil just announced a 69 percent leap in profits this year, while Chevron, ConocoPhillips and others are enjoying similar jumps in theirs. Guess what percentage of those enormous profits the corporations are likely to pay in taxes? Zilch.
Their lobbyists have punched such gaping loopholes in our tax code that they can escape paying anything for the privileges and benefits they get from America.
Exxon, for one oily example, had a $19-billion profit in 2009, but not only did it pay exactly zero in federal income taxes, it manipulated the system to get a $156 million rebate from us.
Likewise, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips had multibillion-dollar profits that year, paid not a dime in taxes, and also got refunds.
Republican lawmakers had a clear choice in dealing with the deficit.
So why did they choose to cut off your granny’s health care, while helping these corporate billionaires make off like bandits? www.texasobserver.org...
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by IndieA
And yet...
Having taken their blunt budget ax to Medicare, Medicaid, Head Start, EPA, NPR, and dozens of other popular and effective programs, they (Republican congressional leaders) then scampered to save one of the least popular and least effective federal programs on the books: the annual taxpayer subsidy for Big Oil.
As gasoline prices were rising to $4-a-gallon and higher, the House GOP voted unanimously to let the oil giants continue siphoning $4 billion a year out of our public treasury.
All 241 of the Republican/Tea Party House members—with not even one dissenter in the bunch—declared that in this time of a supposed budget “crisis,” the neediest among us are not the elderly and the poor, but the little waifs of Big Oil.
Meanwhile, ExxonMobil just announced a 69 percent leap in profits this year, while Chevron, ConocoPhillips and others are enjoying similar jumps in theirs. Guess what percentage of those enormous profits the corporations are likely to pay in taxes? Zilch.
Their lobbyists have punched such gaping loopholes in our tax code that they can escape paying anything for the privileges and benefits they get from America.
Exxon, for one oily example, had a $19-billion profit in 2009, but not only did it pay exactly zero in federal income taxes, it manipulated the system to get a $156 million rebate from us.
Likewise, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips had multibillion-dollar profits that year, paid not a dime in taxes, and also got refunds.
Republican lawmakers had a clear choice in dealing with the deficit.
So why did they choose to cut off your granny’s health care, while helping these corporate billionaires make off like bandits? www.texasobserver.org...
edit on 4-9-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)