It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So explain as I requested. Media is a tool of war is not an explanation. Do you honestly believe the arcs have different dimensions regardless of the images being stretched? Are you denying that they are stretched? What about the palm tree? What about the missing decoration?
I said you don't fake wars. If you need it explained you don't fake entire wars and large scale assaults such as this.
Originally posted by ARealandTrueAmerican
hyperbole.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by sonnny1
That's too black and white to say yes or no.
Yes to secret wars to eliminate future Hitlers. No to secret wars that are purely for military power or economics. Whoever dies in the first, I care not. Who ever dies in the second, depends on who died for me to care.edit on 27-8-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Sort of, yes.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Actually no. I'm not talking about wanting another Iraq. I'm talking about wanting to undo the last 40 years of US policy in the region and let them be as they were then, free to carry out their government.
I simply refuse to leave anything worse than the way I found it.
Not including this video,but do you actually believe everything you see and hear on the television?as well as the newspapers?
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Wow the ignorance of people on this site is just unrea
I find it hard to believe they call us sheeple....when it is obvious who the true sheeple are....
You all claim to know a little more than the general public....when all you get on here is hearsay and gossip...it is the National Enquirer, with a little bit of the Weekly World News, of the paranormal.
A few members are well informed and I have no ill will towards you...it is threads like this which are based on opinion and not fact that get my blood boiling.....God do they assume everything is a conspiracy...a lot of you need to get out more.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Well I actually like the idea of what you were talking about. You act as if Rome trying to input its rules over everyone was a bad idea, but once they died, and the barbarians had a few centuries to contemplate what they did, all of the sudden all the people who hated Rome for its laws, went and erected new laws based exactly on that thing they hated. It's amazing how the Germans, once sworn enemies of Rome, a thousand years after literally declared themselves Roman, basing their rules, military, philosophy, and politics off of Rome.
I've no doubt America will die one day. And I've no doubt that in a thousand year's time, the middle east, Africa, America, and probably most of the world will be basing all their laws and ideas off just what America was.
Democracy is a lie. People can voice their opinions, but if the majority says off with his head, then nobody is going to stop it. Rule of law under a republic is better. Someone is there to stop that if he has the right to speak.
What you define as a welfare state is not what I want. What I want, to be quite frank,
And what I want, is for everyone in Europe to hear your voice. Not your ruse or your lies ... but the truth, that your ideology is the true Enemy of freedom and democracy. And the democratic half of the US, know this ideology for what it is.
CONFIRMED: Libya War is CIA Op 30 Years in the Making
August 27, 2011
Print Version
Tony Cartalucci
BlacklistedNews.com
Alternative media activist David Icke, who has been warning about the false nature of the “Arab Spring” since it began over six months ago, has pointed out an astounding “flashback” regarding an August 3, 1981 Newsweek article titled, “A Plan to Overthrow Kaddafi.”
‘The details of the plan were sketchy, but it seemed to be a classic CIA destabilization campaign. One element was a “disinformation” program designed to embarrass Kaddafi and his government. Another was the creation of a “counter government” to challenge his claim to national leadership. A third — potentially the most risky — was an escalating paramilitary campaign, probably by disaffected Libyan nationals, to blow up bridges, conduct small-scale guerrilla operations and demonstrate that Kaddafi was opposed by an indigenous political force.”
….
Quite obviously this plan has been executed verbatim with the necessary addition of a NATO intervention to rescue the above stated “paramilitary” campaign from Libyan security forces – a contigency plan explicitly spelled out in another Wall Street-London subsidized, signed confession, Brookings Institution’s “Which Path to Persia?”
Using Military Force to Assist Popular Revolutions, page 109-110 (page 122-123 of the PDF): ”Consequently, if the United States ever succeeds in sparking a revolt against the clerical regime, Washington may have to consider whether to provide it with some form of military support to prevent Tehran from crushing it.” ”This requirement means that a popular revolution in Iran does not seem to fit the model of the “velvet revolutions” that occurred elsewhere. The point is that the Iranian regime may not be willing to go gently into that good night; instead, and unlike so many Eastern European regimes, it may choose to fight to the death. In those circumstances, if there is not external military assistance to the revolutionaries, they might not just fail but be massacred.
Originally posted by mars1
Another one for you.
Just watch the man in background.
Thanks