Prophecies, dreams & visions concerning nuclear war

Originally posted by bogomil
OK.

And just for your information, I'm not the type getting into historical verification-quibbles. A message, an ideology, a system etc. can be valid by itself. Generally I don't put much importance to 'authority' claims.

No worries, you asked for examples of Paul's education, You shall have examples of Paul's education.

Originally posted by XplanetX
They were of 'noble' character, something that you could aspire to Bogomil.

I rebuke fellow Christians as publically as the sins they commit: That was condescending and only detracts from conversation. Don't do it. Simply writing with a light tone does not make it less of an offence.

Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX

 

You wrote:

["They were of 'noble' character, something that you could aspire to Bogomil."]

But won't, as this kind of 'nobility' to me seems like giving up individualism and the abilty to think rationally; having this exchanged for grovelling to 'authority'.

Could you, once more, try to keep a decent standard...even when there are no rational arguments available. Character analyses are of NO relevance to this thread.

They are still relevant, but I will try to refrain.


'Noble' definition:

1. having eminence, renown, fame, etc.; illustrious
2. having or showing high moral qualities or ideals, or greatness of character; lofty
3. having excellent qualities; superior
4. grand; stately; splendid; magnificent: a noble view
5. of high hereditary rank or title; aristocratic
6. chemically nonreactive, esp. with acids and air; precious; pure: said of metals, esp. gold, platinum, etc.; also said of any of the six inert, or nearly inert, rare gases in group VIIIA of the periodic table

Originally posted by michaelwpayton

Originally posted by bogomil
OK.

And just for your information, I'm not the type getting into historical verification-quibbles. A message, an ideology, a system etc. can be valid by itself. Generally I don't put much importance to 'authority' claims.

No worries, you asked for examples of Paul's education, You shall have examples of Paul's education.

Originally posted by XplanetX
They were of 'noble' character, something that you could aspire to Bogomil.

I rebuke fellow Christians as publically as the sins they commit: That was condescending and only detracts from conversation. Don't do it.

I am sorry.

reply to post by XplanetX


Bogomil deserves the apology, you and I are good.

Sorry Bogomil.

Please forgive me.

Originally posted by XplanetX
Sorry Bogomil.

Please forgive me.

Sure, no worries. And I CAN be very annoying, so it's understandable, though not functional.

Originally posted by bogomil

Originally posted by XplanetX
Sorry Bogomil.

Please forgive me.

Sure, no worries. And I CAN be very annoying, so it's understandable, though not functional.

Nah, it's all me. I bring out the beast in you.


MT 18:21 Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?"

MT 18:22 Jesus answered, "I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.


I have 76 arrows remaining.

reply to post by XplanetX


You wrote:

["Nah, it's all me. I bring out the beast in you."]

Yes. It's called rational reasoning..

Originally posted by bogomil
The main problem in this is the usual one.

Why does speculation as to current times and biblical prophecy present a "main problem?" This is the Religion, Faith, and Theology forum is it not?

Originally posted by bogomil
It really doesn't fool anyone, and just gives the impression of a theist parallel to the reasoning of those building 'perpeteum mobiles' (apologize spelling).

Who said he was trying to fool anyone?

Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX

 

You wrote:

["Nah, it's all me. I bring out the beast in you."]

Yes. It's called rational reasoning..

Are you suggesting that I am irrational because I have a relationship with my Creator?

Originally posted by XplanetX

Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX

 

You wrote:

["Nah, it's all me. I bring out the beast in you."]

Yes. It's called rational reasoning..

Are you suggesting that I am irrational because I have a relationship with my Creator?

Please skip the mindgames and relate to what I wrote.

Originally posted by graphuto

Originally posted by bogomil
The main problem in this is the usual one.

Why does speculation as to current times and biblical prophecy present a "main problem?" This is the Religion, Faith, and Theology forum is it not?

Originally posted by bogomil
It really doesn't fool anyone, and just gives the impression of a theist parallel to the reasoning of those building 'perpeteum mobiles' (apologize spelling).

Who said he was trying to fool anyone?

edit on 10-9-2011 by graphuto because: (no reason given)

If you quote me in context or possibly pick out some central sentence/issue, it may have meaning. So if you have some comment you want to get across, give it another try and this time not with a sentence of practically no importance for my whole post.

I didn't take your quotes out of context. You're babbling on and on in your "intellectual speak".

Originally posted by graphuto
I didn't take your quotes out of context. You're babbling on and on in your "intellectual speak".

Whereas 'prophecy, dreams and vision' - speak is worth listening to and is not babbling.

Each to his/her taste.

Originally posted by bogomil

Originally posted by XplanetX

Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX

 

You wrote:

["Nah, it's all me. I bring out the beast in you."]

Yes. It's called rational reasoning..

Are you suggesting that I am irrational because I have a relationship with my Creator?

Please skip the mindgames and relate to what I wrote.

When a conversation goes into a direction that you dislike you accuse me of playing mind games.

The only mind games being played here are in your own head.

Originally posted by XplanetX

Originally posted by bogomil

Originally posted by XplanetX

Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX

 

You wrote:

["Nah, it's all me. I bring out the beast in you."]

Yes. It's called rational reasoning..

Are you suggesting that I am irrational because I have a relationship with my Creator?

Please skip the mindgames and relate to what I wrote.

When a conversation goes into a direction that you dislike you accuse me of playing mind games.

The only mind games being played here are in your own head.

It appears, that the theist contributions now have lost all contact with thread topic and concentrate on character-analysing etc. I'm offski.

Wow this thread lasted only five days. It's been Bogomil'd.

I wanted to post that both I and my spouse have had a dream of a nuclear bomb going off last year.
And on a dream forum a young woman told us of a nuclear dream too.

In my and my spouse's dream we weren't harmed but the young woman was killed; She didn't have relationship with the Uncreated Creator.

I like this thread. But the Nazi dreams were the worst they are the ones I am worried about. They never went away, just underground.

Peace