Has curiosty really killed that cat?

As human beings we are born inquisitive, it shows in our senses e.g our touch, smell and sight and the rest of what we are born with. without them we would struggle to look or find a answer to that natural sense, which as people we are programmed with. But to not have them you would have to look for an answer why you was put in this situation, again as humans we are natural seekers. We always look for a reason who, why, where and when to any given situation e.g who was kennedy? why did he get assasinated? you know the rest....
As a person i often wonder what this site would be like if life happened just as it does, no masterplan, manipulation, new world order, mind control,ufo's, religions etc....What if life is just life, and its all one big #in coincidence, is that plausable in any human beings mind? answer is no way. Cause life would be pretty rubbish if our senses told us otherwise, on this site it's always what, where when why? most posts on this site lead with that first word that drags and draws us in but when it gets to the crunch it always leaves you dissapointed, because questions can be given from a whim and how strongly somebody feels about the situation that arose in the first instance, and anyone with a strong mind who strongly believes will not back down, so any opposition will strongly disagree.
ATS gives the slogan DENY IGNORANCE aint we all ignorant in one way or the other we all believe and disbelieve in different topics right?
anybody agree???
Sorry for any bad spellings or punctuation but i really cant remember where, when or why i went to school :Z

deja vu....


Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.

Schrodinger also killed the cat and did not kill the cat.

reply to post by kwakakev


I refuse to look in the box! just in case me knowing is what killed it

ignorance is preferred in some scenarios

Of course it hasn't. Curiosity can claim a much larger ransom if the cat is still alive.