It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the debunker arguement that nasa knows all is just sooo stupid. but seems to be only way to debunk these claims. trust me, there is still much to discover. and much still unexplained.
It just came to me very clearly, that its far more than that. These symbols, that have been put out and misinterpreted, spoon fed in false religions to the masses, are a real scientific body of information, put in plain sight for each generation of bloodline to pass on and decipher speaking of the discharges and plasmology of the electric universe and relating to CYCLES, and NWO.
This is their library. And they look for the signs coded in them, to prepare.
Do you still believe that comets are dirty iceballs despite the findings of NASA's own studies?
Have you explored other models?
Why are the findings that are so unexpected, exactly what EU theorists would have predicted to be found in comets?
Do you reassess and revalue your paradigms when presented with evidence that is contrary?
If the current theory on comets is invalid...
...and they're something else...
...and can be explained best by the EU theories...
...and if this fits with the scalar technology...
...that Tesla himself, who set out to demonstrate the EU theory...
...and was a believer...
...then why is there current applications of Telsa's technology used today, such as HAARP...
...then WHY do you think we're being misled?
In an EU universe, electrical comets can affect both planets and stars, do you wonder if we're being told all there is to the story?
Do you think there is nothing to question or see, despite murals on airport and banks walls, and the symbology that is all around us, including on bank notes?
Do you accept the official story that Leo discovered this comet in 2010, roughly a decade after Leo discovers it in a movie, though with all the Infared equipment in space, they probably already saw this.
Do you think it likely or unlikely that they already photographed this comet?
Do you think that currently, using the scalar technology that they would already have studied comets and be able to create their own effects that are similar?
Do you trust the ones managing the world?
Do you see references in the media, news stories, and articles that seem like spin, concerning economic crash downs, and see possible connections between events and subjects discussed from NASA to Fox News?
trust me, there is still much to discover. and much still unexplained.
NASA found the comets were such a mystery they did not follow their expectations.
However, just prior to the Deep Impact Mission, the EU theorists, made predictions of what would happen and this is what occurred.
The FACTS are that, have been displayed, so you must be experiencing some blocks in information, or for some unknown reason are unable to take it in.
Anyone with the slightest knowledge of physics can point out howler after howler in what you have written.
Really ? I do have some, my friends have some too. No, we cannot point out. We are in doubt in fact, as well as NASA stuff - as they have much more data, they are really in trouble, as if thouse data would be useful to prove their thesis - they would be sumbitted, as they do not meet the theory of non-EM comets - they are simply junk.
If you wish to find out some link about the deep impact - do it yourself, google is your friend. It exists, and the information is very simple - they expected to find out rocks, not water, and they found what they expected.
In a paper appearing in Science Express on Feb. 2, 2006, an article by Sunshine et al. reports on the Deep Impact science team's finding of a small area of water ice on the surface of Tempel 1. This is the first time that water ice has been observed on the surface of a comet. Past efforts with the near-IR spectrometer on Deep Space 1 mission flying past comet Borrelly and from the ground of comets far from the sun and not enshrouded with coma, have yielded no evidence of water ice on their surface....
What is significant is that the extent of this ice on Tempel 1's surface is not sufficient to produce the observed abundance of water and its by-products in the comet's coma. The team thus concludes that there are sources of water from beneath the comet's surface that supply the cometary coma as well.
Also important is that the particle size of the water ice, is greater than the icy grains in the coma, and is probably recondensed onto the comet's surface. It is therefore probably not a primary block of cometary material which would be called a cometesimal.
Originally posted by soleo
reply to post by Unity_99
It certainly is strange that the reverse of the 50 swiss Francs banknote (I got one here in front of me)
depicts something that very oddly resembles Earth's magnetosphere
.
The official explanation for the design is that it is a reference to the artwork by the artist depicted on the front of the bill, Sophie Taeubler-Arp, but I can't see anything among the depicted artwork that gets even close to the image on the bill.edit on 26-7-2011 by soleo because: link did not show properlyedit on 26-7-2011 by soleo because: link does not show properlyedit on 26-7-2011 by soleo because: link does not show properly