posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 05:35 AM
reply to post by DAVID64
Again like you, I don't claim to be a super Geologist, infact far from it. However i do live in an Earthquake zone so i do think i can speak with
some experience. Japan's quake was the fourth (Correct me if i am wrong) largest earthquake ever recorded. These earthquakes are their own events
respectively however they are considered aftershocks due to the fact that they occur because of the mag 9. If you look on the wikipedia page for the
Japanese Earthquake:
en.wikipedia.org...
It does record the 3 7's as their own events even though they are aftershocks. All together the 9 has generated over 60 mag 6's and higher so you
can understand why they aren't all their own events.
And here is the definition of Aftershock;
An aftershock is a smaller earthquake that occurs after a previous large earthquake, in the same area of the main shock. If an aftershock is larger
than the main shock, the aftershock is redesignated as the main shock and the original main shock is redesignated as a foreshock. Aftershocks are
formed as the crust around the displaced fault plane adjusts to the effects of the main shock.
Source:
en.wikipedia.org...
Our city of Christchurch has experienced 3 major quakes since sept last year; 7.1 4th September 2010, 6.3 22nd of February 2011 and 5.5 & 6.3 13 of
June 2011. All the quakes that follow the 7.1 are considered aftershocks because they are caused by the main event even though some such as the 22nd
are their own event on their own fault line.