It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Man they are moving ahead quickly
The Arecibo telescope is probably better, in terms of sensitivity, and it's more of an apples to apples comparison with the Russian telescope because it's also a radio telescope.
Originally posted by anon72
What would be better. The USA's James Webb Telescope program or this one?
The RadioAstron telescope has a 10-meter antenna, a tenth of the size of the biggest radio telescopes on Earth
The last sentence there is key to understanding the difference. The Russian telescope will need to aim longer at the same spot than the Arecibo telescope to get as strong a signal.
The huge "dish" is 305 m (1000 feet) in diameter, 167 feet deep, and covers an area of about twenty acres.
The Arecibo system operates at frequencies from 50 megahertz (6 m wavelength) up to 10,000 megahertz (3 cm wavelength)....
The giant size of the reflector is what makes the Arecibo Observatory so special to scientists. It is the largest curved focusing antenna on the planet, which means it is the world's most sensitive radio telescope. Other radio telescopes may require several hours observing a given radio source to collect enough energy for analysis whereas at Arecibo this may require just a few minutes of observation.
Originally posted by Alkimyst
Seriously, come on all you people bitching we're falling behind, i love the fact that you don't specify which country is falling behind, its obvious you mean us U.S.A, but cant you just shut up and relax there is a whole world out there, i'm glad for the russians we should be working together not, My country is better than your country, cause we has more missles and we also has, better telescopes, *ne ne nene ne*...
Seriously this is why we have such a bad name.
Originally posted by anon72
Well now, isn't that special. I hate to say it but... Good for them. Well, actually good for Mankind.
I am a little disappointed that it is the Russians doing this and not the USA but... I guess it is all possible due to the USA blowing it's bucks on other things.
Originally posted by anon72
reply to post by boncho
the only Science in the world that can get 150% molar yield chemical reactions...
Could you please elaborate on this please.
Thank you.
1
In Russia even research institutes of an anti-scientific bent have appeared. Here's just two examples: The International Institute of Space Anthropoecology and the International Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics. The first of these managed even to get government accreditation with the aid of the Ministry of Science. And the second received financial aid from this same ministry for several years and from the Ministry of Defense for the well-known fraud with torsion fields. I want to note that Russia is no exception. For example, in the US a Maharishi University has arisen whose activity bears little resemblance to intellectual activity.
I wonder if this could be a space weapon, or weather weapon too?
Originally posted by anon72
reply to post by drakus
Thank you for you awesome replys/post.
I am still a little confused but I will work with what you gave and see what I come up with.
What would be better. The USA's James Webb Telescope program or this one?
Originally posted by boydro
Does anybody know the name of the telescope__????
excelent post!!