It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Adyta
How is this different than "We don't them thar negros in OUR restaurants!" or "NO JEWS" outside of restaurants in Nazi Germany?
Originally posted by Adyta
Jesus, people support this crap? You aren't the only people on Earth. If you want to eat "in peace" cook a meal at home.
"I'd rather eat in peace" "I don't wanna eat with kids running around"
How is this different than "We don't them thar negros in OUR restaurants!" or "NO JEWS" outside of restaurants in Nazi Germany?
If I went to a restaurant and someone pointed at my kid and said "We don't serve those people here" I'd punch them square in the face.
If someone is being disrespectful or are disturbing other customers, tell them they have to leave. I guess blatant discrimination only works when people want it.
edit on 7/11/2011 by Adyta because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maslo
So, how is this different than discrimination based on race? Children tend to be disturbing to others - ban all children. Blacks tend to be criminals - ban all blacks. I dont see any difference in principle.
There is a cognitive dissonance here. Why not ban disruptive children only? Or why not allow whatever discrimination the private owner wants, even based on race? Otherwise the law is not consistent.
Originally posted by NuLife
Wow! Reading through this thread makes me now understand why a lady at Denny's once turned around and said "You have well behaved children." (ages 3,12) I thought that was a lil odd at the time but now I see why.