It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, is concluding a weeklong visit to Mexico, where she expressed concern over abuse of citizens by police and soldiers fighting organized crime groups. The major effort against drug cartels and other criminal organizations that began shortly after Mexican President Felipe Calderon took office in December, 2006, has now claimed around 40,000 lives. Experts say ending official corruption and impunity is the biggest challenge the government faces in trying to win the war.
"I view with concern the increasing reports of human rights violations attributed to state agents in the fight against organized crime," Pillay said.
She said authorities should not view respect for human rights as an obstacle, but as part of the solution in combating crime.
President Calderon responded that the worst abusers of human rights in Mexico are the criminal gangs that have tortured, mutilated and killed thousands of people. The drug cartels are fighting the government and each other as they compete for lucrative smuggling routes and drug profits.
Citizen attitudes about police in Mexico may be part of the problem. Surveys have shown that Mexicans have little respect for their police and that paying small bribes to avoid such inconveniences as a traffic ticket is still common practice in much of the country. Mexican police are usually paid little and given only minimal training.
For the government to tackle such problems it will need public support in both spiritual and material terms. George Grayson says Mexicans in the upper and middle classes, who have been absent from this effort, need to do more and pay more.
Originally posted by randomname
the drug war has claimed more lives in mexico than the war on terror, 9/11, afghanistan and the iraq war combined and in less time.
Originally posted by Homedawg
So what does "The UN" suggest be done?Occupation by "peacekeepers"? Sounds like a laed up to occupying other countries that dont act right...like maybe the US?
Originally posted by Homedawg
Oh,BS on that....we dont occupy Russia,China or most of Africa or the Euro nations...thats just more Hate-The-USA crap
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
The Drug War has been a tool to erode rights and privacies. I saw it happening while living in the US but it is fairly new here, and there is still more expectations of privacy here than across the border.
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
I believe it will find its ending here,
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
but if not then it will become a problem the rest of the world will have to deal with.
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
The Drug War has many agendas but its publicly-stated purpose of stopping drug traffic is apparently not one of them.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
The Drug War has been a tool to erode rights and privacies. I saw it happening while living in the US but it is fairly new here, and there is still more expectations of privacy here than across the border.
...the only thing "fairly new" about it is the name...
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
I believe it will find its ending here,
...i dont...
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
but if not then it will become a problem the rest of the world will have to deal with.
...the rest of the world doesnt give a damn - too busy worrying about their own problems... they might pay lip service but thats about it...
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
The Drug War has many agendas but its publicly-stated purpose of stopping drug traffic is apparently not one of them.
...stopping drug traffic was never the purpose (here or there)...
...take care...
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
I don't recall anyone saying in just a few words what its purpose is/was.